this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
168 points (89.3% liked)

PC Gaming

9567 readers
855 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, nah. Not falling for it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

The PC Parts industry basically stopped making new hardware for games so we should pretty much give up on the notion of things improving substantially past this point.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Look, cyberpunk ended up (after some years) being a good game, but that doesn't mean I'll ever trust them again

[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago

I will wait to buy it a few years after release. Not getting burned this time around.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

I'll believe it when I see it this time.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Yeah i'll believe that claim when i see it.

Sorry but the 2077 release had it's consequences.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

It’s going to be fun to watch 20 same looking NPCs with same looking clothes living their daily lives with schedules, again.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

This announcement changes everything! I'm gonna send them my money right now

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Here we go again...

[–] [email protected] 85 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 day ago

This is exactly what they said about the OG game and they even spoofed a gameplay trailer to lie about it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

i need to buy a computer one day so i can play all these games everyone spends money on and hates

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago (14 children)

Coming from the team behind the least realistic/reactive crowd system in any game to date

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Yeah I don't believe a single thing CDPR says anymore. I'm still waiting for them to release the patch that makes your decisions in Cyberpunk actually matter. Fool me once.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

they didn't really boast it as the title would imply. it's a job posting so my take is that it's more aspirational or setting a target.

patch that makes your decisions in Cyberpunk actually matter

I would like more consequences like the pickup mission where you have to think of actual factions but the game offers a lot of choice.

Most choice is gameplay and build related where you have multiple methods of completing an objective and many times you can go out of order. This is in stark contrast to gta which has better sandboxes but much less gameplay choice is missions.

Even still there are things like taking out Jotaro in the one gig affects the dialog with Woodman later, playing as corpo allows you to skip the infiltration for the arasaka float, judy or maiko for clouds, and the endings are all as powerful as they are varied. I would still say your choices matter as even your chosen sex affects romance options. Phantom liberty expansion elevate the gigs and choices a bit more. For example the sphere hunter gig where you infiltrate the ncpd headquarters adds a check at the end if you went lethal or not. If the main boss can't detect their biomonitors then you can't leave without a fight (though i also encountered a bug here).

For the sequel i definitely want more reacting NPCs more dynamic open world behavior vs map icon hunting, and more consequences that are also faction-based like maelstrom vs militech

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Cool, now it's just 8 years of waiting for release and then just 4 more until they make it playable

[–] mp3 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Which validates the point that buying a game on pre-sale or Day 1 is a terrible idea.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (6 children)

With PC reviews pretty much lying about the game's performance and CDPR not allowing console reviews prior to launch, i was misled into buying it on PC day 1. IGN gave it a 9/10 and most other big reviewers werent far off.

It was pretty much a coordinated false advertisement until CDPR could get their hype money... I mean yeah they fixed it but it did take 4 years and i did already get burnt out on an inferior version of the game.

I learned my lesson then that i can only trust community reviews and that any media outlet always has an agenda.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They didn't fix it. There's some interesting writing there but other than that, none of the original promises came to fruition. The cops still teleport (just a little further away), the crowds are still dumb as shit (worse than GTA3) and react inconsistently and erratically. Your choices don't really matter till the last mission. The game's image has been rehabilitated because NVIDIA spent millions to use it as benchmark for its tech and owners of NV cards need to post-hoc rationalise having sold that kidney to buy a GPU. The game is still meh, a bastardisation of cyberpunk mythos. It's very pretty but, shallow as fuck. Play KCD, that's an RPG series that deserves the name RPG.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have no clue how people have been convinced that cyberpunk is the game that was promised. Its a good game from what I understand but it is not anything close to the game that was promised pre-launch. I actually think that it was the anime more than NVIDIA that helped rehabilitate its image.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Very likely the anime helped. I wouldn't even say cyberpunk is good. I played the GTA V campaign recently and with all its idiosyncratic choices it plays and is a much more advanced game than cyberpunk in everything but the graphical tech. Trevor, Michael, Frank, Lester, Lamar, Norton, just to name a few from the top of my head. I remember Jackie because he dies and Johnny because he's an annoyance, but there's very little there that's worth remembering. Misty, misty I remember too. People hate on ubisoft open worlds and then hail cyberpunk, I can't even.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

Yeah yeah

Fool me once

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Did they hire Peter Molyneux?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

All I want to know is how I can secondarily profit on a bunch of rubes opening their wallets again.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago

Where have a I heard this before? It sounds really familiar

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Yeah maybe just release your game without the hype this time.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Because we all know how well their promises played out for the first one...

It did get finished, eventually. Hope they stop hyping their games up like this. Just release a trailer like Witcher 4 and keep your heads down and work on it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

They had a rough start for console players, or so I've been told, but I strictly play on PC and never had any issues whatsoever, so I'm looking forward to the next game for sure. There's no doubt that the game was a great one, and Phantom Liberty was the DLC that finally knocked the Shivering Isles out of the top spot for me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm gonna just assume it won't be any different than the crowd system of Assassin's Creed; which wasn't even all that impressive back when that first came out.

They said CP2077 would do things no other game did. That was a lie. They are also claiming a new IP they are working on will do the same. I don't really trust them when they say they will be doing something that's never been done before because they can barely make things that have been done to death work properly. And honestly, even the best designers have made that promise and failed to deliver, so whenever I hear the phrase "never seen in a game before" I usually just check out because it's never been true.

They are amazing at the artistic side of things (the visuals, the audio, the story-telling); but when it comes to the technical side? They are pretty bad.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I assumed we wouldn’t be getting a sequel. I hope they are able to get one out there eventually. 2077 is has the coolest aesthetics I’ve ever seen in a game.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Cyberpunk was the last game I preordered preordered and it was because of the blatant lies they told about the game before the release and still have not (and will not) deliver on.

I loved the world they artistically manifested and expanded in some ways (thanks Pondsmith!), loved the music, loved the start of the game. I have yet to finish it because it's still a buggy mess at times.

I'll finish it one day, everyone says the DLC is great. But it will be several solid and honest game releases before I trust cdpr again with any sales pitch. Until third parties have their hands on it, we can't even trust the footage.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›