this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
151 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

4554 readers
365 users here now

A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 65 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Google is the biggest threat to open web

Degoogle, deny the parasite engagement and profit.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Degoogle by getting a Google Pixel now!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Unfortunately true ever since divestos stopped being developed. Living without a smartphone is pretty hard nowadays, but a reasonably secure and private smartphone (or anything really) is something reserved for the tech-enthusiast and you have to give money to Google.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What about GrapheneOS then?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

It requires you to buy a Google Pixel Phone and its too complicated for the average user. Just look at the usage guide, I completely understand anyone who wouldn't want to deal with any of that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

I miss CyanoGenMod back in the dizzay.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

Well i degoogled my Google Pixel with LineageOS and microG.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There are other options but yes pixel hardware is the best choice currently

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Everyone here is aware of the irony that the most effective way to degoogle is actually to use a pixel. Its dumb but its the reality.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

My next phone will be a Fairphone.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Funny thing is your sibling comment is criticising Mozilla trying to do just that :)

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I am not following. Which comment?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

The one by JamonBear.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 days ago (2 children)

As Mozilla moves into advertising and AI, I wonder how long their position on Manifest v3 will last...

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago

Indeed. And Mozilla never clearly say how long they'll support Manifest V2. The blog reads like typical corporate wording.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Where do you think most of the current income comes from?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If Mozilla drops Manifest v2 I might as well switch to a chrome variant (not brave).

I don’t want a web monoculture but it might as well be if Mozilla just copies chrome at every step.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 days ago

Reading this article makes it seem like they are doubling down on not dropping MV2, and instead maintaining both manifest versions so that they can retain maximum compatibility and options for the user.

Not supporting MV3 at all would likely hurt them a lot in the long run, and adding support for it to the existing MV2 only opens up more options for addon devs.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago

That's a relief.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago

Gave me a heart attack with Mozilla and manifest v3 in the same subject

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (4 children)

What's the way forward for Chromium-based browsers? I use Edge instead of Chrome for my work (Firefox for everything else) to keep data out of Google's clutches since we use so many Google services. Since I use uBlock Origin on both I'm concerned Edge will follow the leader and take it away.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago

To stop using them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

"What's the way forward for coal-fired steam trains?"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There's an MV3 version of uBlock Origin, but it's kind of sparse. I switched to Adguard and it works just fine.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

Called uBlock Lite for a reason.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I've seen some occasional mentions of Cromite as an option for Chromium but not Chrome, so may be worth looking into. If open source isn't a key detail, Vivaldi may also be worth considering.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

including new AI functionality

Yeah, more bullshit! I use Firefox because it's the only one with uBlock Origin.

We’ll keep you updated on what’s next for extensions in Firefox

They may be lying as usual which means I have to be proactive and find a future browser. It's sad that I can't trust Firefox anymore.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

It becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy if even a post explicitly stating that everything uBO needs to function correctly will keep being supported, is interpreted as the exact opposite "because they may be lying". Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Can't use Chrome, can't use Firefox. The only sane choice left is Safari. Is Apple the better alternative now?

Edit: don't be mistaken. I'm still using Firefox and have no plans to switch.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

You definitely can still use Firefox. They haven't added any AI nonsense beyond local translations and local image descriptions for accessibility. The article posted here is about how they're not removing MV2 support, so uBO still works on Firefox. Since Firefox is open source, I guarantee that the moment they try to change that there'll be a fork.

Stick with a Gecko browser to keep the market share up.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Fennec on android and librewolf and mullvad on desktop

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How likely are those to remain viable once the source (Firefox) becomes too disparate?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Gonma cross that bridge once we get there...

But yes not very viable once mozila pulls a Donald Trump

I think there is do work being done on alternatives.

Also, firefox code base could be forked and we all will need to pay for it to be developed like adults

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah we have all our eggs in this one basket now. Would be nice if Europe would fund an alternative or two.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago

EU would rather fund US mega corps while buying Russian gas 🤡

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Its nice they are keeping compatibility with version 2 but I feel its about forking time for an alternative.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've already been on Waterfox for years, personally.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

waterfox does not use manifest?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't understand; are you asking a question?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yeah Im wondering then if waterfox maybe uses the original firefox add on thing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I haven't limited into it much, but I don't see why not!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

why not just not introduce the changes that do nothing but break ad blockers?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

That's literally what the post says is happening?