this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
5 points (100.0% liked)

Apple

720 readers
36 users here now

There are a couple of community rules in addition to the main instance rules.

All posts must be about Apple

Anything goes as long as it’s about Apple. News about other companies and devices is allowed if it directly relates to Apple.

No NSFW content

While lemmy.zip allows NSFW content this community is intended to be a place for all to feel welcome. Any NSFW content will be removed and the user banned.

If you have any comments or suggestions please message one of the moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

MagSafe is not included in the iPhone 16e because "most people in the iPhone 16e's target audience exclusively charge their phones by plugging them into a charging cable."

...well how did they determine that?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Poor people obviously can’t afford a MagSafe charger. Target market is poor people who can’t afford a $1000 phone. Ergo.

But seriously, i suspect that it’s something along those lines. People who hold onto their phone longer and/or buy older model phones may not use MagSafe. Personally, I only use it in the car. I’m not a huge fan of the idea of charging losses, and I’ve had trouble finding chargers that fit my desires (ie desk charger; I don’t own a watch or AirPods).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

I suspect it's for all the usual reasons. They explicitly removed features to create a distinction from higher end models and hit a specific price point. Same reason the iPhone 16 gets archaic file transfer speeds.

[–] adespoton 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Predictable.

Then again, the only MagSafe accessory I have is my phone case; I’d argue that Apple’s reasoning applies to most iPhone users, not just the 16e’s target audience.

I’m really still struggling to understand who the 16e’s target audience is, really. It’s too expensive for the SE crowd, and missing the Pro features. Is it really a 16 adjusted to be what the 16 should have been?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 16 hours ago

I wonder if they want a lower volume product to roll out their in-house modem for the first time, so positioned it a bit awkward like that on purpose.

[–] veeesix 2 points 15 hours ago

I see the “e” in the 16e as “essential”, so I guess it makes sense if MagSafe is regarded as a bit of a luxury. However, MagSafe has made wireless charging so much simpler that it’s something of a game changer.