this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
358 points (99.2% liked)

News

27571 readers
5325 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lennee@lemm.ee 11 points 6 days ago

Oh yes it will get involved, the US will be kicked out but yes, NATO will be involved

[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 7 points 6 days ago

"Police may have to be involved in my invasion of my victim's home" says criminal

Just fucking try it you orange twat!

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 3 points 6 days ago

He just had Rutte visit and thinks he could arrange that for him. Rutte skirted the question by affirming that the defense of the polar region was important.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

Yes, NATO must get involved if one of its members is attacked.

[–] BlackRing@midwest.social 203 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I hope NATO does get involved. Not the same way Trump hopes though...

[–] happydoors@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

Yeah, what’s he smoking thinking that they would help invade a sovereign nation?!

[–] Nemean_lion 91 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Canada has three of top 5 longest sniper kills. Ukraine has the top spot. We just need to export a small chunk of metal at high velocity into a golf course.

Not getting banned on Lemmy moment

[–] Embargo@lemm.ee 53 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I hope you're prepared to pay an extra 25% on that export.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 115 points 1 week ago (22 children)

This is wholly out of control.

Fix your country, you absolute selfish idiots.

[–] dephyre@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago (25 children)

I don't disagree, but... how?

Join the 50501 protests and/or attend TeslaTakedown protests.

load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 94 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Dumbass doesn't even understand that NATO is a DEFENSIVE pact and that Denmark is a member. Not wanting to give you their territory doesn't count as an attack.

Also if he really cared about security he would have strengthened his ties with his allies instead of pushing them away. The US is far less secure now that it was 3 months ago.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Not wanting to give you their territory doesn't count as an attack.

Having been married to a narcissist for 11 years, yes, that's literally how they think. My ex would fly off the handle if I told her "no" to sex or whatever it was that she wanted. She'd throw out all kinds of excuses about how it was my fault somehow, and even during our divorce, when we were literally separated, she forced her way into my room (we still lived in the same house for a few weeks) just to "cuddle" and would throw a fit if I didn't give in. Remember, we were getting divorced. I had to put my foot down hard on that line. And yes, she would get violent.

Orange presidents with tiny dick syndrome calling a country's refusal to give up territory an "attack" is not much different, fundamentally.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Kill him. I'm Canadian. Come at me.

[–] CowsLookLikeMaps@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Can we stop these kinds of comments? It's exactly what MAGA will use to rile up violence against Canada. Who doesn't like a fun plumber video game but we're better off encouraging and helping Americans to organise.

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

i understand what you're saying in a broader sense, but we're like 100 people here on an internet forum and i'm just fucking around.

but fuck you (don't worry i still love you just per your comment), and here's why:

it's one thing for a guy like me who means absolutely nothing to make a joke. in this case it's not a joke, though - that totally should-be-killed-motherfucker is threatening my country's sovereignty and also my personal rights and freedoms. it's another for that totally totally should-be-killed-motherfucker to make those threats as the bleater of the free world.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago (3 children)

NATO will do exactly nothing to help the bloated orange shit-weasel take over Greenland.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] phoenixz 42 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Trump added that the result was very good for the US and 'the person who did the best is a very good person as far as we’re concerned'

Me too form together words too

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Drusas@fedia.io 38 points 1 week ago

Which side does he think NATO would support?

[–] Krik@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The mighty US of A needs NATO to invade an island with 56,000 inhabitants?

Is Wakanda located on that island or what?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zier@fedia.io 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Greenland and Canada are NATO countries. You cannot attack or forcefully annex another NATO country. If he leaves NATO, he will be up against Canada & Europe. The US is one Twizzler away from having the entire world sanction & boycott it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The more I look into Greenland situation the more I am thinking there's already a psychological campaign in play to get them to be part of the US. They're legitimately trying to get away for the Danish government and there's a strong US presence there already with military bases. I suspect the target is to get them to hand over the keys not only willingly but ask for it.

They are working on interfering in Canada too and have funded far-right groups, including the freedom convoy.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trump-annexation-destabilizing-canada-1.7479890

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 27 points 1 week ago

Given that he regards the Department of Justice as his personal litigators, it makes sense that he’d regard NATO as his enforcers.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He wants Greenland the same way as Putin wanted extra countries. How many countries did Russia invade between 2000 and 2020?

National security is just a pretext. Greenland already contributes to your national security you king. They’re a part of NATO. You already have force projection up there if required.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ferroto@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

An attack on one is an attack on all. I always wondered what would happen if one NATO country attacked another.

[–] lennee@lemm.ee 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Aggressor gets kicked out and NATO has to defend the attacked

[–] nilo@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yep. Because that’s exactly what happened with Greece and Turkey…

[–] lennee@lemm.ee 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well, it was close to happening with greece and turkey. And I dont think cyprus is quite the same thing as the US trying to take over greenland, is it?

[–] nilo@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

I am talking about the Imia crisis in 1996.

[–] Albbi 1 points 4 days ago

I always wondered what would happen if one NATO country attacked another.

Putin sits back and laughs his head off.

it's also an attack on america. jesus fuck do we not remember how this ends?

kill the fucking americans if they pull this shit. make sure they see that open aggression only gets them coffin stuffing, and that only if they're willing to pay shipping.

load more comments