this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
168 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

67077 readers
4722 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The three biggest players in voice assistants –– Google, Apple and Amazon –– have radically different approaches to profiling users, Northeastern University researchers say.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] qwestjest78 54 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I loved my Google Home when I got it in 2017, but when I got into home automation, I realized it is dumb to have to tell a device to do things. Motion sensors basically replace the main thing Google Home does and a Bluetooth speaker is cheap to buy.

I never trusted that they weren't listening to me all the time with the speakers and I never looked back after I donated them away.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, just having a microphone in the house with some predefined voice controls which you can go and change gives you all of the benefits of a Google home with none of the Google bullshit.

Especially now with LLMs getting so big, just go set up voice-to-text ollama session with predefined prompts and responses

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That handles automation, but can't freestyle questions.

"Hey Google, convert (metric) to (Imperial)."

"Hey Google, weather today?"

"Hey Google, what's the capital of Kakistan?"

I have a ceiling-mounted mini in almost every room and just toss questions around while I work or play. Or, just ask it to play music. (Which went to shit when I cancelled Spotify.)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Or, just ask it to play music. (Which went to shit when I cancelled Spotify.)

I learned how to get Home assistant working JUST to restore this feature. Fuck you Google for not supporting other services despite supporting controlling them once it starts going ugh

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

It can if you use an LLM as the interface with guidelines instead of rules

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

So even the most sophisticated profiling is wrong a significant part of the time.

Great. Glad its been so worth it to scoop up all my data and leak it everywhere just to not know how to use it for your stated intended purpose.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

One thing we overlook in ideological debates is that most forms of socialism and communism would have no use for advertising and marketing. Imagine all this effort going to productive endeavors and having an IRL adblock.

May my last online purchase be a beret.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not surprising. Most of Google's profiling is though the web. They don't bother with the speakers and stuff too much because they don't need to.

It's not very useful anyway, any number of people could be using the speaker, regardless of who is signed in

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, but the nsa can listen to you through it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

That's not what this is about. That's a different story

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I use Home assistant with the Preview box for local control, so I can spy on myself.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Have you ever caught yourself doing anything suspicious?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Only when I took Ambien

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This incident will be reported

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

These devices are almost always listening, and the companies behind them are already collecting our data.

Uh oh! Clicks scary link

The good news is, they aren’t recording all the time ... and when they are activated accidentally, the recordings are typically short.

:/ alrightythen

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So what it's saying is that it doesn't need 24/7 recordings to profile us in a way that's profitable for them because we are some basic bitches, right.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Just pointing out clickbait. They don't even accurately reference their own articles. I stopped reading after that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

My Google speaker only hears me say “hey Google, set an alarm in x hours” and “stop”. Good luck profiling me.

And I turned off the Google assistant in my car. It was more a nuisance than a blessing. It would trigger if you said “eierkoeken” which was hilarious when we were talking about those things during a road trip.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

To hear you say "Hey Google" it has to listen to everything you say, all the time. While they pinky-promise they aren't doing anything with all the voice data they're getting while listening, do you trust them?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

While this is true, it's not difficult to verify. You can inspect the network traffic through your router from that device and see whether it's communicating more often or with larger data packets while you're talking near but not to it.

That could be obfuscated with a powerful enough device that's able to maintain the user profile locally and by sending the full profile each time, or by trickling the information out bit by bit as part of a regular heartbeat traffic, but that would require more expensive hardware and would eat up a lot more bandwidth.

Not impossible, but not undetectable either. I'm willing to bet that studies have been done.

Skepticism is good but without thinking through it, experimenting, or doing research to back it up it's just paranoia. Conversely you could say my trust that others would have looked into it is naive.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

studies were done and found similar to what you're saying.

also the secret listening does not comport with any of the business side of profile marketing, either. So it would have to be an incredibly well kept secret on top of all of that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Good point, but given that I don't say anything in my bed room (I live alone, and I don't date), I wish it good luck hearing anything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

eierkoeken

But why tho? That's such a random thing to trigger on. Is it anywhere near "hey google" in Dutch or something?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah it kinda sounds like it. The eier kind of sounds like hey, and koeken sounds a bit like Google.

I've had a few other accidental activations, that I couldn't explain that easily, even from podcasts, that I decided that I didn't need it. But in Android Auto I couldn't find to option to turn off the activation phrase, so instead I turned it off completely.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Ah, pronunciation must be different than I expected. In my head I did "eye-er" like in German, but I looked up Dutch and apparently that's "ey-er" there, so way closer to "hey."