this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
63 points (97.0% liked)

Asklemmy

46954 readers
910 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When examined, or just because it's weird on its own.

Example: Beat a dead horse

  1. You whip a horse to go faster
  2. It dies from being whipped too much
  3. You still want the horse to go faster
  4. You continue to whip it
(page 2) 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 53 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"I'm not here to fuck spiders" - said by Australians who want to drop the preamble and get down to business.

[โ€“] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

And here I was, just assuming that to be true about most people...
How inconsiderate of me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's hilarious, I should try that out

[โ€“] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Nah, surprise everyone.

Leap into the room, exclaim "I'm here to fuck spiders", then drop trou and hump a cobweb.

Keep the bastards guessing

[โ€“] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"There's more than one way to skin a cat."

  1. You have a cat.
  2. You wish to remove its skin.
  3. You realize there's more than just one method to accomplish this unusual task.
  4. You state this proudly as a metaphor for problem-solving flexibility.
load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Does the pope shit in the woods?

[โ€“] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

A humerous combo of 'Do bears shit in the woods?' and 'Is the Pope Catholic?' Which are two jokey ways of saying 'Yeah, obviously, duh'.

[โ€“] Perhapsjustsniffit 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My wife used to work in the backcountry. Lots of unpaved remote roads. Bears apparently do not shit in the woods. They shit on the road.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Do they, or did someone put a road through a bear's outhouse?

[โ€“] corsicanguppy 1 points 6 days ago

Ironically, from a truck driver I learned bears seem to shit an awful lot in the roadway.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But does the pope shit in the woods?

[โ€“] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

No, but bears are catholic

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

No, he's trapped in the pope mobile , that thing isn't equipped for offroad travel

[โ€“] Kurtagag 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Dollars to donuts.

WTF does it even mean?

[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

I'm so sure that this thing will happen, that I'm willing to make a bet whereby I'll pay you dollars if it doesn't happen, and you pay me donuts if it does. I feel like I'm getting free donuts and my dollars are not at risk.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Well, back in the day, a doughnut cost a lot less than a donut.

So, betting dollars against donuts would be a bad idea.

Not that it was ever a betting term, it just condone contains a reference to betting.

It's like saying "hey, lets get dinner. You give me a twig for every dollar I put in."

You're either exchanging something of unequal value, or making an "investment" where you get very little return on it.

[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"scientists say..."

They aren't some unified entity. They don't even agree amongst themselves on most things if one digs deep enough. While there is some interpretation of the data involved, most people that use the phrase "Scientists say..." are essentially saying "Objective observations done by several of the smartest humans have been argued over by several of their rivals resulting in..."

Like, we should start calling them something like Observational Data Warriors โ„ข /s to put perspective on the magnitude of information and depth involved. You can have an opinion but you are a coward of no relevant value if you are not trained for battle and fighting on the front lines. So whatever nonsense you have to say results in you looking like a clown of no note.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Taking God's name in vain

  1. You invoke God on some topic you're wrong about.
  2. God appears and sees your worthless comment.
  3. ????
  4. God punishes you, or he backs away, or he learns to not listen to you anymore in boy cries wolf type situation? Its really not clear what the repercussions are.
[โ€“] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No, no, it was originally "Taking God's name in vein," as saying the name of God out loud would allow Him into your blood. If you say the name of God, you allow him to inhabit your blood, gain your power, and become even more mighty. The ancient Hebrews feared God gaining too much power, as He would be able to destroy the world. Then Christians figured out that if they took Communion and instead drank the blood of Christ, they could reverse the Hebrew God's power and slowly increase their own until they could ascend to the heavens and do battle with the Almighty, empowered by His blood in their veins, rather than weakened by taking His name in vein. In this seventeen-part essay, I will describe how we can defeat God by

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is mind blowing if true. Is this real? What's going on here? Are you serious?

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

yes everything you read on the Internet is true.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Thank you. I thought so.

But seriously. I thought this might be another Tower of Babylon incident. I could definitely see this playing out early on during the vestiges of the mythological era. I was also feeling asleep.

Note to self. Don't comment when falling asleep.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This lore makes more sense than the bible.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

The bible is a collection of thousands of years of oral history and societal laws put to paper generations after the fact, allegory and letters to random fuckers and varying accounts of a Jewish cult leader who was executed for crimes against the state. It's gonna have a potted narrative.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

That's one that always bothered me too. When I say "Jesus fucking Christ" I mean it. Which is it's own weird ism when you think about it...

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can lead a whore to water, but you can't make her douche.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Yap, still guessing

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

"it'll be a bloodbath in there!" *used for anything political wise.

load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ