Surprised they didn't call the 1-900 number to speak to the manager
this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
27 points (90.9% liked)
50501 General
282 readers
437 users here now
General Discussion
founded 3 weeks ago
MODERATORS
I had to wait until I got approved by the admin. Maybe that's what the problem is.
Same here. Then it glitched when I tried to verify my email, but after a couple tries it worked.
Skill issue, stay out.
There's the unity and inclusivity we're trying to foster
The dummies ruined Facebook, they ruined Reddit, and they'll ruin Lemmy too.
Keep the mass organizing for their kind on Bluesky where people at least get paid to deal with their bullshit
"The dummies" didn't ruin either Facebook or Reddit. The companies changing policies and algorithms in an effort to drive profit did.
It's certainly no wonder why people try to avoid you
Generally speaking, you can tell someone's insecurities from what they project onto others.
Sounds like Voyager confused them. I didn't find it intuitive either. I tried a bunch of apps and then came back to the regular web UI.
Looks like Voyager confused them
I don't see the 50501 instance at all on Voyager, and I've noticed that issue with a few of them. If they made their account on that instance I bet they tried to then sign in to .world (the default on Voyager) and then pissed themself off and wrote it off, refusing any future help.
I can't know how much they tried but the way those interactions went it doesn't feel like they really put much effort into solving this problem
I found it on Voyager, but had to search for it with the exact correct spelling "50501.chat" and I only knew about it because I found it referenced in another instance and signed up on my browser on my laptop. I don't think I would have found it on Voyager if I hadn't already known about it.
I can't help but think that the web UI should always be the point of entry, and apps should enter the user experience at a later stage.
If not, users won't understand what platform they are actually using, and they will inevitably get confused at some point when something does not work the way it should. Even if the app is perfect now and everything works, an update to Lemmy could still break something.
Then again, I'm a fan of web UIs in general, and I'm terribly old fashioned.
appreciate that but don't bother. tried with the instance listed in this post and still got the same login issues even after receiving the email to login and passing the security check etc. I deleted the app. I've tried enough times and never had any success so I won't be trying again.
I say good riddance. Let this type of user stay on Reddit.
Yeah, because that's how we build a coalition of like-minded individuals.
Individuals who can't forgive a technical error on a growing platform, yes. Patient, understanding individuals.
Exactly. Everyone who's not technically knowledgeable, or likes to dig deep into a new environment, or just had a tiring day, should stay out. Let them continue to slurp the corpo fascist propaganda on Reddit. Lemmy should be exclusively for the elite. Who are we to offer sanctuary and a sane environment to everyone? Lol.
/s
"this type of user". Great mindset.
Had a tiring day and giving up for now is certainly one thing, understandable and relatable. Trying one instance, failing, and screaming down from atop your high horse 'Don't bother, I won't be trying again' is sanctimonious entitled BS.
Sounds like the user is having problems with the Voyager app?
In either case, I don't think there's any use for the pointless hostility. If it's an antifascist who just gets frustrated with technology, that doesn't mean they couldn't be valuable members of the community. And it's not immediately obvious, nor easy to explain, to non-technical users why they should be more patient with Lemmy than with any other platform. It's quite common to see people on Lemmy or Mastodon who are active users, and still don't understand that the platform they are on is not run by capitalists/how it is fundamentally different from centralized platforms.