this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
30 points (100.0% liked)

Fairvote Canada

571 readers
259 users here now

Matrix Chat


What is This Group is About?

De Quoi Parle ce Groupe?


The unofficial non-partisan Lemmy movement to bring proportional representation to all levels of government in Canada.

🗳️Voters deserve more choice and accountability from all politicians.


Le mouvement non officiel et non partisan de Lemmy visant à introduire la représentation proportionnelle à tous les niveaux de gouvernement au Canada.

🗳️Les électeurs méritent davantage de choix et de responsabilité de la part de tous les politiciens.




Related Communities/Communautés Associées

Resources/Ressources

Official Organizations/Organisations Officielles



We're looking for more moderators, especially those who are of French and indigenous identities.


Nous recherchons davantage de modérateurs, notamment ceux qui sont d'identité française et autochtone.


founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

The Walrus on Bluesky

“Pierre Poilievre has taken anger and frustration that should be directed at the chartered banks that earn billions, grocery chains that earn the same, and the rest of the gougers and redirected it at the Liberals,” writes @drmarkbourrie.bsky.social. thewalrus.ca/poilievre-finall...

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Eh... eh... eh....

The Liberals deserve a good portion of that blame - especially w.r.t. grocery chains which only got a slap on the wrists after the bread price fixing scheme.

It's not like the CPC would have done anything differently had they been in charge (both parties are deeply neoliberal) but the NDP, Greens or BQ likely would've responded much stronger.

[–] AlolanVulpix 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It’s not like the CPC would have done anything differently had they been in charge (both parties are deeply neoliberal) but the NDP, Greens or BQ likely would’ve responded much stronger.

Isn't it a coincidence that all three parties NDP🟧, Greens🟢, and BQ⚜️ support proportional representation?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think the bigger issue is that if a party gains majority it tends to sour on passing PR. Not to get all depressing up in here but in BC the NDP rode to power on promises of PR, held a sabotaged referendum, and never brought it up again.

[–] AlolanVulpix 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think it's still better to vote for parties that promise proportional representation (NDP/Greens/Bloc), than none at all (LPC/CPC).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

I'm in absolute agreement with that.

[–] cyborganism 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

P.P.'s ex-gf and top advisor is Jenni Byrne, one of Loblaws' top lobbyist.

[–] AlolanVulpix 4 points 4 days ago

inb4: Conservatives literally in bed with the lobbyists

[–] Kichae 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

the NDP, Greens or BQ likely would’ve responded much stronger.

Can't speak to Greens or BQ, but every time the NDP has gotten into power, they've done so by betraying their principles and their base. And, as someone who's had way more direct interaction with party insiders than I ever expected, the party machine is very much focused on electability, not serving the public.

So, call me sceptical. And cynical.

[–] AlolanVulpix 1 points 4 days ago

Unfortunately, all parties focus on electability… No potential for serving the public if you can't get elected.

It's still better to vote for parties that promise good policies or proportional representation (NDP/Greens/Bloc), than none at all (LPC/CPC).

[–] dermanus 2 points 4 days ago

He's like a dog that caught the car. His whole shtick was drop Trudeau and drop the carbon tax. Now both have happened.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is exactly what "conservatives" do. They are always looking to point the finger, but never at themselves. They do not believe in majority rules, they want "elites" making all the decisions, like down south.

[–] AlolanVulpix 2 points 4 days ago

Hmm, concentration of power, versus the dissemination of power (as in proportional representation). Makes sense as to why some parties act the way they do.