I love this logic.
If we follow it, then nobody should have stood up to Hitler, because it would mean allying with the racist US and imperial Britain.
this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
180 points (83.3% liked)
Memes
49374 readers
2216 users here now
Rules:
- Be civil and nice.
- Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Because when other countries "stood up" to Hitler it was for moral reasons π€‘
LMFAO this is what happens when you get "education" under a western regime. The racist US and imperial Britain were completely and utterly irrelevant to defeating Hitler. In fact, what they actually accomplished was to ensure that the horrors of capitalism would continue to this day. With the US, it would have been USSR that liberated all of Europe from both the nazis and capitalist oppression.
Don't take my word for it though. Here's what a book produced by US military has to say on the subject.
This. The Russians did all the work and the US and UK come and take the credit
Because the US and UK did nothing else during the war except lend-lease of course. The bombing of German industry, blockades of their supply lines, the Africa-campaigns, extensive intelligence operations, no all of that definitely did nothing and didn't contribute to the war effort at all.
It's likely the Allies would have won the war without the US involved, though it's estimated it would have taken much longer. Without UK involvement, it's more probable that the Germans could have achieved a victory, though perhaps not a total capitulation of the Soviets. Without a western front to guard as heavily, they would probably have taken Moscow by the end of 41 (irl they were 20 miles out). Japan would also have a much freeer reign in the pacific theatre.
load more comments
(8 replies)
load more comments
(44 replies)
If Northern Ireland decided to reunite with the rest of Ireland it would solve so many problems... good luck trying to convince the Northern Irish of that.
The other day I was thinking about tensions that exist in part because of British-drawn borders. Israel-Palestina, India-Pakistan. Can't believe I forgot NI.
Depends how far you want to keep going back...English talking about Russia and Ukraine like they don't still occupy most of Wales
Depends how far you want to keep going back β¦.English talking about Russia and Ukraine like we donβt still occupy all of Cornwall.
Depends how far you want to keep going back β¦.Wessex dudes talking about Russia and Ukraine like we donβt still occupy all of Mercia.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Ah yes. Whataboutism. Suppose a robber acts in defense of a person about to be robbed. That may or may not make them a hypocrite, but it certainly doesn't make them wrong.
Or would you say it would somehow be more right for the robber to stand back and allow the robbery "because they're in no position to point fingers"?
One might worry about the motivations behind a murderer who murders another murderer and what that might mean for the original victim.
load more comments
(13 replies)
The ENGLISH are the occupiers. Scotland and Wales are also occupied.
They talk shit on every country as if they live in a utopia which is genuinely hilarious
I want to know who thinks we live in a utopia.
As it happens you don't actually have to be a social chauvinist for the country in which you reside.
Don't forget the Falklands.
Never heard of them. Maybe you mean the Malvinas.
Quite right you are. So I did.
load more comments
(4 replies)
the french talking about russia and ukraine
view more: next βΊ