this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
285 points (97.3% liked)

science

17605 readers
325 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 65 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I am curious at how many of these pointless reports are going to be made. I have seen countless reports like this and at the end of the day we are drowning in plastic.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Every year there is a new article about a scientist finding a new bacteria, funghi worm or other kind of species that can digest plastic. However they work only in perfect lab condition and on smaller scale. Sadly there is no real world usage yet.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I think the grand irony about this thing is that if there really was a bacteria that could eat away it plastic there would be a mass panic -- "new dangerous bacteria found eating away at plastic containers, all packaging rotting on store shelves!"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Bacteria can eat wood and paper. That doesn't mean they disintegrate on the shelf. Environmental conditions would still have to be right for that to happen.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I worry about it eating the plastic in our body. Unintended consequences

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If it just eats plastic and nothing else. This is actually a good thing. Eat all the microplastics you can little bacteria

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If the waste product is deadly in small amounts then it's still a disaster.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Yep. Ain't the bacteria that gets you, it's their shit. Same reason you can sterilize rotten food and still get sick.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You’re not wrong, but that’s what science and research ARE. If you want engineering and commercialization, go subscribe to those communities, not “science.”

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Meal worms do indeed eat stryofoam, but not sure they would do it in the wild given other food sources.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago

Now those woke scientists are making transgender wood /s

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How much transparent plastic do you have as a building material in your house? Because we already have a non-plastic alternative - it’s called glass. And that’s what ALL the clear surfaces are in my house envelope.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think that may be a statistically generated image. And/or someone was really lazy in thinking up what the post image should be.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Because the actual product picture is quite underwhelming. Scroll down the article for a look.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Looking forward to having that in my balls as well as microplastics

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

damn imagine how cool it'll be if your balls become transparent

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

No, no. Just the scrotum. I want to see the balls.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Cool? I don't know man, would someone lick them if they saw what's under the hood? Would you?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Transparent means that you can't see them

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

True, I guess my thought was more skin transparency.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don’t think were replacing plastic anytime soon but using materials smarter is always nice.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (4 children)

But we should, because plastic is made of oil. And that oil goes CO², be it because it's burned or because it rots away in nature.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Don't talk to me until it's transparent aluminum

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Both are technically and historically accurate. I also prefer aluminium, however, due to the consistency with other element naming.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I prefer to achieve consistency the other way. Radum is a dangerous element for example

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

American researchers

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Now, all we need is a bird of prey and two humpback whales.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I'm skeptical of this for two reasons.

  1. The thing that makes plastic as a building material so useful is that it takes forever to degrade. Biodegradable building materials seems like it would be counterproductive and make the problem worse, not better.

  2. So far, every time some new variety of biodegradable plastic comes along, it turns out to be a big fat lie.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago

Biodegradable just means you protect it just like we protect current biodegradable materials. But your #2 stands, the research is great but until I see it in production or on a shelf for sale, it's just research.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You realize we still use wood for most housing frames, right? Wood is biodegradable.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The framing gets sealed and protected from moisture. It is not exposed to the outside. Exterior exposed wood is either pressure treated to resist rot, is a species that is naturally rot resistant, or it is painted.

Remember, the article is talking about altering wood to be both transparent and biodegradable. That sounds like a window to me. That is a role that is currently filled with either glass or plastic. You would not choose a biodegradable material for exterior use and most windows are used on the outside of a structure.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Exactly. Even pressure-treated wood gets pockmarked relatively quickly with nicks and scratches. It’s not visible on wood since it’s already so textured, but a transparent surface would be rendered opaque.

That aside, the whole article reads like AI slop. This paragraph is particularly obvious:

Instead of refilling the pores with epoxy, the team soaked the cellulose layer in a mixture of egg whites and rice extract. A curing agent called diethylenetriamine was also added to keep the atrial see-through. Importantly, the team says that the amounts of the various chemicals and reagents used in the process were small enough to present a danger to the environment. According to the team’s statement, they were “left with semi-transparent slices of wood that were durable and flexible.”

It’s just a collection of four sentences without any real unifying idea. And the latter two sentences are complete nonsense if you really read them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Vacuum chamber transparent wood filled with resin. Ok yeah sure that'll "replace plastics"

If you'd like a real demo of what this article is talking about check out this NileRed video

https://youtu.be/uUU3jW7Y9Ak

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

I also assumed that was the process here, but from the article this does seem to be something slightly different. Overall process seems to be roughly the same, but they're using biodegradable materials instead of resin, apparently a mix of egg white and "rice extract"

Now I'm personally skeptical about how long-lasting something made from egg and rice can be, although I guess there are still tempera paintings (tempera paint is made from egg yolks) around from the Renaissance, so what the hell do I know?

And the chemicals used to strip the lignin from the wood aren't exactly the most environmentally friendly, but I guess arguably they're better than some of the ones used in plastic production.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

I dont think transpaency is the attribute we need for most plastics. Thats glass.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

I’m gonna build a clear house like that to retire in just to make sure nobody buys any lots within viewing distance of my saggy old man balls.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Never heard about again.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Are they transporting humpback whales to the future?

load more comments
view more: next ›