this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
818 points (98.6% liked)

News

28416 readers
4349 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

after a police investigation into allegations made following the broadcast of a Channel 4 documentary

"The Crown Prosecution Service reminds everyone that criminal proceedings are active, and the defendant has the right to a fair trial.

Were the allegations not brought to the police before the tv documentary? Why didn't the police investigate before? If so there should be an investigation and prosecution of those involved in the "non-investigation".

This failure to investigate is an outrage, many people including me listened to Russel Brand in the 2010s, but the police failed to investigate and now has the gall to say "the defendant has a right to a fair trial"? Does the public not also have a right to a fail investigation and prosecution?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Russell Brand... Why is that name familiar?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

He used to be in movies I guess, he turned rapist once he got outed by the news. Then he pivoted right wing, naturally as a way to shield himself from criticism

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 64 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

But he's always seemed so sane and stable?

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Certainly not the type of guy they would write a movie about an unstable, unpredictable, impulsive, and self centered rock star with him in mind to play the lead.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 60 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I am shocked!...it took this long. Dude has been a creep forever. He has been getting exponentially worse as time has went on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago

I'm shocked, I tell you, shocked.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 days ago

I've been thinking for a while that people that have a sudden right wing or andrew tate sphere turn are really just trying to get with like minded rapist, or whatever they're into, circles. Basically networking and putting out signals.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago

Charged with rape again, right? Didn't we-the-people already cancel this idiot once?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is the guy we should be deporting.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Wealthy immigrant accused of rape and spewing lies at every turn? Deport him? They going to offer him a job leading what ever department he wants to demolish. Probably justice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

Its always the ones you expect

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hard to believe someone who looks like a rapist and acts like a rapist is a rapist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (15 children)

honest question here. unless there is video and audio proof. how the fuck could someone be charged for this 20+ years later over "he said she said"? like how the hell does that work. Could i just pick a random person and say they raped me in 2002 and then they will go to prison?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

unless there is video and audio proof. how the fuck could someone be charged for this 20+ years later over “he said she said”?

Same way a cold murder case gets investigated when all the DNA has degraded. They rely on circumstantial evidence. Now, that word has been corrupted by procedural crime drama TV shows, but make no mistake, a LOT of criminal cases are successfully prosecuted based on circumstantial evidence, because it is still legitimate evidence even though it's not direct evidence. They'll go through his electronic devices and look at text messages and photos and retrieve voice mails, they'll conduct interviews with others who were told about the allegations at the time and see how those stories line up, and so on.

I'm not as familiar with this particular case as others are, but from the other comments I've read, it looks like the victim(s) had already filed police reports 20+ years ago, but those didn't go anywhere for whatever reason (lack of evidence, incompetent police work, etc). So that helps the case quite a bit.

Could i just pick a random person and say they raped me in 2002 and then they will go to prison?

Technically, yes. There have been cases where this has happened, although it is extremely rare. The police would investigate your allegations and almost certainly find them lacking, at which point you would be charged with filing false police reports, and most likely sued by the person you accused.

Here's a fun statistic: A man is more likely to be raped than to be falsely accused of rape. Just in case you were wondering how often the latter happens.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›