this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
1444 points (99.4% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2901 readers
278 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/28140949

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ansiz@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Even taking his bullshit argument at face value, he thinks the best solution for these violent drug addicts is to leave them out of the street? Who is the audience here? If you literally think they are all violent, why is leaving them free to roam around the right solution?

I know it's all about money and grandstanding on his part but this definitely seems like some under-the-influence kind of deep thoughts.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 31 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Wild claim, considering Musk is one of the most violent drug addicts who has ever lived.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 6 points 6 days ago

I wonder what we should call a violent drug addict, convicted of inciting insurrection, living in housing paid for by the public ?

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 7 points 6 days ago

He is so fucking incoherent from all the ketamine it isn't funny.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 34 points 6 days ago

TIL Elon Musk is homeless.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 19 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Let's say, for sake of argument, that Elon is correct. Should we not be helping people with severe mental illness?

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 3 points 6 days ago

He is a literal NAZI! So he wants mentaly ill to suffer for losing the gene lottery!

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I can’t speak for Elon (and will not defend him) but Kyle (from Secular Talk) is dramatically underestimating the problem by tossing out the $20 billion figure. You can’t just throw a bunch of money at a person with severe mental illnesses and addictions and just expect them to be okay.

The state of California has spent over $24 billion on homelessness since 2019 yet the number of homeless people in the state has grown by 20%. Obviously they aren’t spending the money wisely in a manner that would maximize reduction of homelessness, but Kyle didn’t specify how the money should be spent either. Perhaps that’s actually the hard problem: how do you spend the money in the way that would be most effective?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LillyPip 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Homeless: without a home.

Weird how he’s lying again. I’ve been there, and I can promise this fuckwit that not having a roof or food in the middle of winter in a city where the stoplights literally freeze is not some kind of illusion. That being prodded away from a public bench in sub-zero temperatures so you can shamble a few blocks whilst the sleep in your eyes freezes, over and over for weeks, so you can’t get more than an hour sleep at a time for months, isn’t the holiday he thinks it is.

Jesus christ, I bob my head to the surface for this? It’s like he’s not even trying to be relatable now.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Not allowing billionaires to exist would end homelessness

[–] LordGimp@lemm.ee 8 points 6 days ago

Why does "violent drug addicts with severe mental illness" mean somehow they shouldn't be helped anyways?

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

the US in total is a right-wing place that thinks that "hard work" is the way of life, and anybody who doesn't adhere to that is a "drug-addict" or a psychopath.

[–] Gowron_Howard@lemm.ee 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Which is wildly ironic because billionaires don’t actually work.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

*working and grifting

where grifting essentially means forcing your subordinates to work harder

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 12 points 6 days ago

Also half of all homeless people are foster kids who aged out of the system. They don't have a family to fall back on.

[–] RaphJ@mamot.fr 11 points 6 days ago (6 children)

@Confidant6198
"secular talk" is wrong here.

Musk is an absolute psychopath without any empathy. He doesn't need any excuse to sleep at night knowing all the harm he did to the world.

By destroying USAID, this devil just threw millions of people into starvation.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] murmurations@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

One of the talking points in South Africa goes like this:
The "homeless" black people that live in corrugated metal slums all have mansions that were stolen from white people and given to them by the government when apartheid ended.
They choose to live in slums to work in the cities, and go back to their mansions when they're not working. Alternatively, they don't live at their mansions because they are too lazy/dumb to actually take care of the property.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago

Hahaha that's gold. It's kind of hard for me to accept anybody really believes that. Feels like some disingenuous conviction there or deliberately not examining the statement because they know on at least one level it's too completely illogical to be true but then again there are some people who've had such serious distortions to their reasoning over time that they're not even lying anymore when they claim to believe this stuff.

Several times in the US I've been told that people flying a sign are actually rich from all the money they are given. Totally absurd but people believe it. Mansions they don't live in is on another level though

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 days ago

Remember, they are saying what would need to be true to justify what they plan to do. This should be read as Elon declaring intent to put homeless people in camps.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago

I'm surprised he chose to express his point in this manner. Unless this is an expression of humanity from Mr Musk that we're so otherwise unaccustomed to that it's hard to recognise, then I assume he wants to persuade people to have less empathy or sympathy for homeless people, not more. This statement, taken at face value would seem to suggest that contrary to what some may think, homeless people are facing significant challenges not of their own making that have contributed directly to their circumstances.

I'm going to guess that's not how he meant it

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

take it from him

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Bet Elon he can't beat homelessness with 19 billions.

Bro will do it just to prove you wrong

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 3 points 6 days ago (11 children)

Elon spouts BS all the time, but $20 billion to end homelessness is some of the biggest bullshit I've ever heard.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments