this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
706 points (97.7% liked)

Funny

9112 readers
1655 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 102 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I want to take it one step further.

And no, I don't care if there's good reason to believe that Tyrannosaurs weren't fluffy like owls, I still want a decent artist's depiction of a T. rex with owl-level fluff.

[–] [email protected] 108 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

A giant murder sparrow would be horrifying as fuck, ngl.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Horrifying AND cuddly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Anyone who thinks feathered dinosaurs are somehow less terrifying need to be locked in a room with a cassowary

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or just look at depictions of terrorbirds. They actually coexisted with early humans.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

They still do if you're antipodean

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Came for this, not disappointed

[–] MelonYellow 6 points 2 weeks ago

They might’ve really had feathers! It’s funny how Jurassic Park colors our perception

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 60 points 2 weeks ago (16 children)

Artist's depiction =|= AI slop

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yay

I should warn you my wedding dress will have spiked shoulderpads with Warhammer style spikes

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

ill_allow_it.gif

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Feathered tyrannosaur of Asia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yutyrannus

Feathered tyrannosaur of North America: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanuqsaurus

[–] [email protected] 84 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hippos will absolutely fuck you up, though.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Yeah pic 2 is just an artistic depiction of their inner selves

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Inside all of us there are two hippos...

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Hey, that's not fair, I've really been trying to lose weight.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

And it shows! You look like just 1.8 hippos now!

[–] n7gifmdn 3 points 2 weeks ago

Take your upvote

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

It’s like that is the hippo’s Slayer form from Baldur’s Gate 2.

But they have a Bruce-Banner-esque secret… they are always the Slayer.

[–] [email protected] 84 points 2 weeks ago

Fun fact, the reason some dinosaurs are depicted with lips is because the asymetrical wear on their teeth doesn't match with modern equivalent's that have exposed teeth, meaning they had "labial scale" lips.

Image owned by Mark P. Witton

[–] [email protected] 67 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hippos are so friend shaped it's unfair.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 2 weeks ago

IT'S A TRAP! chomp

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The reason for the stretched skin look for dinosaurs initially is because of the comparison to lizards, who do frequently have their skin stretched on their bones except in a few places. Unfortunately things like that have momentum, so changing it takes even longer than it took to catch on.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm still pissed at Jurassic World cowardly going with the old designs when they could have shown the current knowledge, much like the original movie has.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I haven't watched Jurassic World, but wasn't that kinda explained with the frog DNA? I heard something to that effect. Meaning that they knew they weren't like the original animals.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

yes, henry wu even says something along the lines of that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Eh, in universe it fits the continuity. They're not dinosaurs, they're lab created animals that fit an inaccurate public perception of dinosaurs . Corpos keep corping, why mess with a winning formula

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago

An interesting book on why many dinosaur depictions are wrong and what they may have looked like.
The hippos teeth peg it as a mostly vegetation, so depictions would favor that line.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Holy shit, this is exactly this book:

All Yesterdays: Unique and Speculative Views of Dinosaurs and Other Prehistoric Animals

There was a great podcast that pointed me to it: https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/welcome-to-jurassic-art-redux/transcript/

I think that's it. I've already done more searching than I intended to get the name of the book. You're on your own.

I wanted to be an archeologist when I was a kid because I loved dinos. This book speaks to me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

To whoever likes this sort of fantastical speculative artistry, one of the authors C.M. Koseman also wrote and illustrated All Tomorrow's, which is a similarly speculative view of humanity from the fictional perspective of a paleontologist in the unfathomably far future, after humanity spread to the stars and experienced an apocalypse that leads us down countless evolutionary paths. Content warning: Body horror, cosmic horror, but presented in an academic way.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I wish I was one of the snake people. Look at him. He is at peace with his Sock and Juice.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The term "artist" here is being used kind of loosely. They're doing the bare minimum you need to turn a skeleton into a living creature. Good artistic representations require a lot more imagination, beyond what we scientifically know. You can get clues by looking at already existing animals and how they relate to their skeletons. Which gives an idea of how much not bone material those creatures might have. No you won't know exactly how much they did, but that's not really being represented by skin wrapping either is it. Better to try and go for something believable rather than the bare minimum.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Does that hippo have a beard?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

It has a badly shaven mustache, so the beard is likely

load more comments
view more: next ›