this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
29 points (65.6% liked)

Privacy

37639 readers
1344 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 43 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Man, I haven't seen a goat.se in years

[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 23 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

That's probably the only reason I clicked it. Honestly, kinda regret that I did because the author just seems like a dude yelling at the sky because he's wildly critical of the smallest things but doesn't offer up any solutions.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Poop 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Not trying to be pedantic, but the original was goatse.cx

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah everyone likes to call it "Goat-see" or "Goat-say", but it was originally supposed to be "goat-secx" i.e. "goat sex".

[–] Poop 4 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I think part of the confusion may be that when the site was taken down, the mirrors that sprung up were things like goat.se, etc.

I've heard it pronounced "goatsee" and said that myself back when the original site was live. You are 100% right on the intent of the name though.

[–] skankhunt42 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Is this a random thought or should I not click the link?!?

Edit: oeuf. There it is. Nice.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 33 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)
[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 25 points 4 weeks ago

The fact that there are no interoperable third-party implementations, or even third-party builds/distributions of the Signal app

that's not true, Molly is perfectly fine

[–] Lemmchen@feddit.org 18 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Hard to take them seriously, if they can't even use a search engine to realize most of this is complete bullshit. What is this? A Twitter post?

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 15 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

What is this? A Twitter post?

Just about. JWZ is known for his cynical hot takes on tech in general.

I don't think any of his complaints are invalid, though his conclusions are uncharitable at best. Making a communication tool that's both reasonably secure and sufficiently palatable to people who don't know how to use computers to achieve broad adoption is a hard problem with no perfect solutions. If he has a better idea, well... he's a skilled and somewhat famous programmer; he's better equipped than most to implement it.

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

There are some fairly good solutions tho. Matrix is still kinda half-baked (specifically thinking about 2.0 and Element X) and Conversations has limited capabilities, but they are fairly easy to use

Edit: Although I would really wish Matrix had a 'normie-mode', with secure and reasonably easy to handle defaults

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

I use Matrix, and I've moved some conversation with people I met in public rooms there to Signal because it kept failing to transfer keys rendering it unable to decrypt messages. I haven't seen that in a while so maybe it's fixed, but I haven't been using it for one-to-one conversations lately.

Unfortunately, I've found most people have a lot of resistance to adding another messaging app. I don't really understand why that is, but it's true. Asking someone to install a messaging app when I'm their only contact who uses it and they have another way to contact me has a success rate near zero.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] breadguy@kbin.earth 18 points 4 weeks ago (12 children)

~~most~~ some of the stuff on that list isn't even true (at least not anymore) lol

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

What specifically isn't true?

[–] breadguy@kbin.earth 4 points 4 weeks ago

4/5, and partially 1 bc mobcoin doesn't use pow or pos.

disclaimer: I don't fw signal or cryptocurrency of any kind

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 11 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

Is there a better alternative? I don't see anything conclusive in the link on that front

[–] Yesbutnotreally@lemmy.world 10 points 4 weeks ago

It’s like a politician, “Look how bad the others are” and then not proposing anything better (because at this moment, there isn’t).

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 weeks ago (9 children)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] breadguy@kbin.earth 4 points 4 weeks ago (8 children)
  • matrix if you want cloud storage for conversations
  • jami or briar if you're okay with p2p
  • simplex for the most secure cryptography and "just works" better than p2p
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] furrowsofar@beehaw.org 3 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

The big upside of signal is that it is better then SMS, and has more adoption then any of the other reasonable options. Adoption is still not enough to make it that useful when compared with Messenger and SMS and even with this addressbook thing your complaining about trying to drive it.

Big downsides abound too including needing a phone number, and being tied to a phone.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments