this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
600 points (98.5% liked)

World News

46880 readers
4048 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 106 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (7 children)

“To protect children” is a stupid reason, but banning smoking anywhere outside of your own home, or spaces expressly dedicated to it, on the other hand, is how it should always have been.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Replace “children” with “non-consenting people” and you’re getting close. Children are the most non-consenting people in society and deserve special protection accordingly.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

There is an absolute metric shitload of proven scientific evidence that smoke inhalation causes lasting damage to developing lungs and hearts. Do you deny this scientific evidence?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 days ago (6 children)

I'm from the UK where it's at least banned indoors.

Visiting European pubs/bars where people still smoke is nuts and my clothes always stink after

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Smoking should be banned. Full stop. When my neighbours smoke I can't even open my window, I have asthma. The smell attaches to the walls. There is also my kitchen where I cook and I can't enjoy my little place outside because it constantly smells cigarette because they smoke regulary.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I thought everyone in France smoked, including the kids, no?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In cliché world yeah.... But in reality, not so much. 😀

It been years... no... decades that smoking have nearly disappeared around me - including in the office.

I work with hundreds of people and the amount of people smoking can fit one hand. 25 years ago, i needed more than 2 hands to count them. And in my family, nobody starting at my parents generation and younger smokes.

Same story with wine during lunch. 25 years ago, it was several bottles each day at lunches.

Today, no more wine bottle and the trend started since easily 15 years now. Only for big occasion and the quantity have decreased a lot.

People drink more beers now. But far less than wine.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

I gave mine nicotine patch from age 5.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

all the more reason. what's the point of banning something if no one's doing it

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

I like these laws but also I want to smoke in some places. I'd love a return of places like cigar lounges and whisky bars

[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You could say smoking is one of the most human activities ever. Does nothing but actively harm and potentially kill everything around you. Just what we're the best at.

But seriously now. Can we speed up smoking bans? Like, everywhere?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Yeah prohibition is famous for working very well and not have any side effect.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

But seriously now. Can we speed up smoking bans? Like, everywhere?

Some European countries, including mine, has decided to raise the smoking age by 1 every year, essentially banning the next generation from smoking. Not really rapid or speeding up, but future is looking good

There was a slight problem where some people were allowed to smoke for portion of the year after birthday and before the age increase, for every year

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

That I can't get on board with personally. Everyone has a vice.

Imagine doing that with cannabis or drinking. Probably wouldn't get near the support even though those are also vices.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HugeNerd 10 points 2 days ago

LOL like here in Montreal I see people smoking right next to the "No smoking within 3 meters" or whatever sign.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 days ago (45 children)
load more comments (45 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

To protect children, meanwhile the soil is filled with cancer-inducing products pumped away illegally by big chemistry plants. In belgium and netherlands we can barely eat our own produce thanks to this. When are we gonna ban them??

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (3 children)

GOOD point. They shouldn't ban cigarettes until everything else bad is also banned.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

But they shouldn't ban anything else bad unless everything bad is banned. Fuck we can't ban shit

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

yeah also ban those... how does all that affect this exactly?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Ban children!?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

This comment section is a disaster, just as bad as reddit. Comments of no substance on the side of popular opinion get upvotes, and waves of downvotes come for anyone who disagrees even a little, and even if they do it in a reasonable way.

I’m mildly asthmatic so I don’t smoke, vape, etc. I have tried a few times and it is simply too much for my lungs to cope with. I still think banning people from smoking in public parks or on beaches is a bit much, and not doing the same with vaping seems like a strange double standard. I had a college roommate who both vaped and smoked, and the vaping bothered me more. I still put up with it.

Hopefully enforcement is reasonable - respectful smokers who deliberately try to keep their distance should be allowed to enjoy themselves, but I understand prosecuting(?) those who show no care and smoke right next to nonsmokers.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The issue with smoking is the second hand smoke. It causes cancer, among many other health issues. Vape on the other hand doesn’t really have this same concern.

They aren’t banning smoking because of nicotine, they are banning it because it causes cancer.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Comments of no substance on the side of popular opinion get upvotes, and waves of downvotes come for anyone who disagrees even a little, and even if they do it in a reasonable way.

Lemmy seems much worse for this than reddit TBH.

There's a number of topics about which any dissent is met with vehement derision. As in those engaging in wrong think are assholes.

I don't really know of course but I suspect it's because lemmy has a narrower demographic than reddit. Opinions are just generally more homogeneous. I guess I'm describing an echo chamber.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I love how everyone supporting this just assumes you'll still be able to smoke at your own home when it doesn't saying anything of the sort. It explicitly states 'where children COULD be present'. This is literally everywhere short of some BDSM dungeon. This is basically going to make the population choose between smoking and having kids.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Which actually sounds fair. Kids do not choose to be born and do not need to inhale smoke because parents are addicted to smoking

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Adderbox76 13 points 2 days ago

This is basically going to make the population choose between smoking and having kids.

Hell I'd start smoking again.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Yeah don't smoke near your kids. It's not that hard.

They're also making the population choose between drinking and driving.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I live in a country with a strict outdoor smoking ban and I love it.

There are dedicated smoking areas for people to smoke outdoors, but they are really small and cramped with smokers.

It’s actually really nice, you never see or smell people smoking unless you wonder too close to the designated smoking areas which are often really out of the way.

The streets are not really clean here, but at least it’s not cigarette butts. Even things like vapes need to be smoked in a designated area, but sometimes people do it on the street anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago

Good i hope more countries adopt this. Türkiye is terrible for this, lovely country and people but there are smokers almost everywhere.

load more comments
view more: next ›