this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
2 points (100.0% liked)

Ars Technica - Science

72 readers
3 users here now

Serving the Technologist for more than a decade. IT news, reviews, and analysis.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

On May 23, President Trump issued an executive order entitled "Restoring Gold Standard Science." And, in news that may surprise our readers, it sounds remarkably good, focusing on issues like reproducibility and conflicts of interest. While there were a few things that could be phrased better, when it comes to basic scientific practices, the language was remarkably reasonable.

So, why didn't we report on what appeared to be a rare bit of good news? I'd considered doing so, but the situation is complicated by the fact that the order is structured in a way that makes it very sensitive to who's responsible for implementing it, a situation that's subtle enough that I couldn't figure out how to handle it well. Fortunately, I only had to wait a week for a member of the Trump administration to show just how dangerous it could be and highlight its biggest problem.

On Sunday, Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary appeared on one of the weekend news programs, where he was asked about the decision to limit pregnant people's access to the COVID-19 vaccines. The host mentioned that aggregation of studies involving a total of over 1.8 million women had shown the vaccine was safe and effective.

Read full article

Comments


From Science – Ars Technica via this RSS feed

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

"Fools Gold Standard Science"