this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
173 points (86.2% liked)

Hacker News

1737 readers
785 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

There were a few offhand things Trump said before the election that sure sounded like he was letting slip that the election was rigged - but at the time I chalked them up to his usual overconfident bullshit. Some guy made a video a few months ago highlighting some of the statistical anomalies shown in the article. I thought he made a very persuasive case for vote manipulation but lacked technical evidence. Now that's coming out as well. I sure hope this plays out like it should. All it takes is one senator to formally challenge the legitimacy of the election and start an investigation.

[–] Randomgal 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

How is this relevant? Not only you have a king now, but he wasn't elected by popular vote anyways, he was elected by the electoral college, who aren't bound to follow the popular vote.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Y'all say these things sometimes that make one think you just wander around in a nihilistic haze of submission and defeatism.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago

The relevance is that when he is overthrown, the history books will have more justifications as to why

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

No. He wasn't. Computer cracker rewrote the software that the computers followed with blatant lies.

Event that shit that you think counts otherwise, is not in any relevancy upon any "if" to any result that was a product of a completely fucking obvious fraud.

You either know you're a CIA asset, or you think you got some gorram nonsense lack of logic denial of what is not difficult to see if you stop picking up other people's literal shit, wiping it on your face with open eyes, and think that that thing that you keep mentioning is anything other than a trick you chose to accept in exchange for what they told you life was and you didn't ask any real questions or even bother to decode the not-paper or read any of the books explaining everything about what that means.

They erased the gold relevancy and waited another full gen before people forgot how real life worked before they accepted the sigil and let go what life is.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The numbers feel too coincidental and so a theory like space-based voting machine fraud doesn't seem as outlandish as it should. At the same time, it attributes to these people a level of finesse and planning that I just don't see from them.

The brute force "suppress votes and lie constantly" is much more Trump's style. It's basically his whole brand.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

Hitler was a moron, that doesn't mean the Nazis didn't have any clever engineers.

[–] Jason2357 6 points 1 day ago

That argument is straightforward and clear and should be spread more widely than it is.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I agree. While the main article is goes deep into obscure (albeit interesting) machinations, your article is very on point. It starts with

if you’re expecting a sexy story about Elon Musk messing with vote-counting software from outer space, sorry, you won’t get that here.

And then lays down the numbers:

— 4,776,706 voters were wrongly purged from voter rolls according to US Elections Assistance Commission data.

— By August of 2024, for the first time since 1946, self-proclaimed “vigilante” voter-fraud hunters challenged the rights of 317,886 voters. The NAACP of Georgia estimates that by Election Day, the challenges exceeded 200,000 in Georgia alone.

— No fewer than 2,121,000 mail-in ballots were disqualified for minor clerical errors (e.g. postage due).

— At least 585,000 ballots cast in-precinct were also disqualified.

— 1,216,000 “provisional” ballots were rejected, not counted.

— 3.24 million new registrations were rejected or not entered on the rolls in time to vote.

It continues listing concrete things people can directly influence. I liked the article, thank you soo much. Very insightful.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The article makes a great point that there are just too many coincidences in all of this, the theories behind the tech also seem quite sound.

The flipping of swing states on election day but not flipping enough to trigger a recount, so suspicious how a criminal president could be so popular. Especially when many people knew what was at stake, project 2025 had been vocalized a lot.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I think a big part of the whole picture could also be why in gods name did the Democrats concede before the day even ended?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My mind went right to the DNC leaders being complicit. Maybe they were shown a window or pictures of their children or they are just shitty people.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah i don't know. But they sure went back to thier mansions real quick and stayed out of the picture.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

These kind of conspiracy theories downplay how much of a piece of shit Nation we have become and how selfish the populace voted.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

These aren't theories. Trump said, in his inauguration speech at 53min in, that a non-citizen did that just for him and "rigged the election." He says that he would KNOT have won but that he get the role anyways.

Of course his first task is to clip the buyout on the last check of court in his last time in place. Since then, butchering anything and everything in the "governing" and started the Auction to hand out all parts we built and ruled to...Billionaires? He is pending every USD to show how worthless it is now that it has no real guarentee left since they shot the one guy trying to validate it with Gold the way we used to.

That was Russia? Totally not the CIA.

Doesn't matter now. Everyone is tricked to think the "example" (defenition via the first public "anon" written description) is the real deal despite showing everything, what it does, where, from, to, amount, etc. into a log that will never end.

It is the Snitchcoin. Force corporations to use it so that we can tax the collection of thieves pretending to be human.

Don't take my obvious source be accepted as the REAL trustable means. Do your research. Understand how the open source works. Then you don't need my word. You will understand why Monero was kicked out of nearly every gamble box of loss used to carry pretendables like Zcash, etc.

Meh...do whatever. I ain't telling you what to do like they ate during this pig bank gluttony.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I don't see what they're hoping to accomplish with this. The pool has been poisoned for years by baseless claims from the far right about election rigging. No amount of evidence is going to change those peoples' minds, and for the others, you're preaching to the choir.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Even from a legal standpoint, Trump won the election. Good luck uncertifying electoral reviews⸮

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

E-voting across the US has been a continuous attack vector of covert election fraud for over 2 decades, and in all that time nothing was done to harden them to any legitimate degree.

The oligarchy wanted Trump, and they've been subverting democracy longer than all of us have been alive. The SC was already used to steal the presidential election for Bush ffs.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

That's not something you will ever solve on FPtPVoting anyways🤷‍♀️

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

With the Dominion voting lawsuit in place as precedent, whomever is gonna make these election claims better have an airtight fucking defense.

[–] Kowowow 10 points 2 days ago

It would almost be suspicious if they didn't sue with such a big case to back them up

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Momentum is building on this one.

Either people looking into this are going to be “discouraged” or more evidence will be examined and a consensus will arrive.

Not saying which way. IMO the rhetoric of Trump prior to the election was basically a confession and I’ve no doubt the election was interfered with. Without any evidence, that is :|

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

That wasn't confession, 53min into that "inauguration" speech, that was bragging.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

It was weak and impotent when the Republicans did it. So I guess the Democrats feel left out.

load more comments
view more: next ›