this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
393 points (98.0% liked)

Selfhosted

48687 readers
1987 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What’s your go too (secure) method for casting over the internet with a Jellyfin server.

I’m wondering what to use and I’m pretty beginner at this

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Cloudflare. No public exposure to the internet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 38 minutes ago (1 children)

Are we not worried about their terms of service? I've been using pangolin

[–] kalpol 2 points 22 minutes ago (1 children)

We are, Batman, we are.

I VPN to my network for it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 minutes ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago)

I expose jellyfin and keycloak to the internet with pangolin, jellyfin user only has read access. Using the sso 🔌 jellyfin listens to my keycloak which has Google as an identity provider(admin disabled), restricting access to my users, but letting people use their google identity. Learned my family doesn't use anything that isn't sso head-to-toe.

It's what we do in the shadows that makes us heroes, kalpol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

“Technically” my jellyfin is exposed to the internet however, I have Fail2Ban setup blocking every public IP and only whitelisting IP’s that I’ve verified.

I use GeoBlock for the services I want exposed to the internet however, I should also setup Authelia or something along those lines for further verification.

Reverse proxy is Traefik.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

If you’re a beginner and you’re looking for the most secure way with least amount of effort, just VPN into your home network using something like WireGuard, or use an off the shelf mesh vpn like Tailscale to connect directly to your JF server. You can give access to your VPN to other people to use. Tailscale would be the easiest to do this with, but if you want to go full self-hosted you can do it with WireGuard if you’re willing to put in a little extra leg work.

What I’ve done in the past is run a reverse proxy on a cloud VPS and tunnel that to the JF server. The cloud VPS acts as a reverse proxy and a web application firewall which blocks common exploits, failed connection attempts etc. you can take it one step beyond that if you want people to authenticate BEFORE they reach your server by using an oauth provider and whatever forward Auth your reverse proxy software supports.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

My go to secure method is just putting it behind Cloudflare so people can’t see my IP, same as every other service. Nobody is gonna bother wasting time hacking into your home server in the hopes that your media library isn’t shit, when they can just pirate any media they want to watch themselves with no effort.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Nobody is gonna bother wasting time hacking into your home server

They absolutely will lol. It’s happening to you right now in fact. It’s not to consume your media, it’s just a matter of course when you expose something to the internet publicly.

[–] Auli 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

What a bunch of B's. Sure your up gets probed it's happening to every ipv4 address all the time. But that is not hacking.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Anything you expose to the internet publicly will be attacked, just about constantly. Brute force attempts, exploit attempts, the whole nine. It is a ubiquitous and fundamental truth I’m afraid. If you think it’s not happening to you, you just don’t know enough about what you’re doing to realize.

You can mitigate it, but you can’t stop it. There’s a reason you’ll hear terms like “attack surface” used when discussing this stuff. There’s no “if” factor when it comes to being attacked. If you have an attack surface, it is being attacked.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

@EncryptKeeper That’s my experience. Zombied home computers are big business. The networks are thousands of computers. I had a hacker zombie my printer(!) maybe via an online fax connection and it/they then proceeded to attack everything else on my network. One older machine succumbed before I could lock everything down.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

No, people are probing it right now. But looking at the logs, nobody has ever made it through. And I run a pretty basic setup, just Cloudflare and Authelia hooking into an LDAP server, which powers Jellyfin. Somebody who invests a little more time than me is probably a lot safer. Tailscale is nice, but it’s overkill for most people, and the majority of setups I see posted here are secure enough to stop any random scanning that happens across them, if not dedicated attention.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

No, they are actively trying to get in right now. If you have Authelia exposed they’re brute forcing it. They’re actively trying to exploit vulnerabilities that exist in whatever outwardly accessible software you’re exposing is, and in many cases also in software you’re not even using in scattershot fashion. Cloudflare is blocking a lot of the well known CVEs for sure, so you won’t see those hit your server logs. If you look at your Authelia logs you’ll see the login attempts though. If you connect via SSH you’ll see those in your server logs.

You’re mitigating it, sure. But they are absolutely 100% trying to get into your server right now, same as everyone else. There is no consideration to whether you are a self hosted or a Fortune 500 company.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

No, they are actively trying to get in right now. If you have Authelia exposed they’re brute forcing it.

No, they aren't. Just to be sure, I just checked it, and out of the over 2k requests made to the Authelia login page in the last 24 hours, none have made it to the login page itself. You don't know jack shit about what's going on in another persons network, so I'm not sure why you're acting like some kind of expert.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 54 minutes ago) (1 children)

Yes they are. The idea that they’re not would be a statistical wonder.

2k requests made to the Authelia login page in the last 24 hours

Are you logging into your Authelia login page 2k times a day? If not, I suspect that some (most) of those are malicious lol.

You don't know jack shit about what's going on in another persons network

It’s the internet, not your network. And I’m well aware of how the internet works. What you’re trying to argue here is like arguing that there’s no possible way that I know your part of the earth revolves around the sun. Unless you’re on a different internet from the rest of us, you’re subject to the same behavior. I mean I guess I didn’t ask if you were hosting your server in North Korea but since you’re posting here, I doubt it.

I'm not sure why you're acting like some kind of expert

Well I am an expert with over a decade of experience in cybersecurity, but I’m not acting like an expert here, I’m acting like somebody with at least a rudimentary understanding of how these things work.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 49 minutes ago (1 children)

Yes they are. The idea that they’re not would be a statistical wonder.

Guess I’m a wonder then. I’ve always thought of myself as pretty wonderful, I’m glad to hear you agree.

Are you logging into your Authelia login page 2k times a day? If not, I suspect that some (most) of those are malicious lol.

That’s 2k requests made. None of them were served. Try to keep up.

Well I am an expert with over a decade of experience in cybersecurity, but I’m not acting like an expert here, I’m acting like somebody with at least a rudimentary understanding of how these things work.

Then I guess I should get a career in cybersecurity, because I obviously know more than someone with over a decade of supposed experience. If you were worth whatever your company is paying you in wages, you would know that a rule blocking connections from other countries, and also requiring the request for the login page come from one of the services on your domain, will block virtually all malicious attempts to access your services. Such a rule doesn’t work for a public site, but for a selfhosted setup it’s absolutely an easy option to reduce your bandwidth usage and make your setup far more secure.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 44 minutes ago (1 children)

a rule blocking connections from other countries, and also requiring the request for the login page come from one of the services on your domain, will block virtually all malicious attempts to access your services.

Whoa whoa whoa. What malicious attempts?

You just told me you were the statistical wonder that nobody is bothering attack?

That’s 2k requests made. None of them were served.

So those 2k requests were not you then? They were hostile actors attempting to gain unauthorized access to your services?

Well there we have it folks lmao

[–] [email protected] -1 points 38 minutes ago (1 children)

Whoa whoa whoa. What malicious attempts?

I said it would block all malicious attempts. I didn't say the people trying to access my services were malicious. Clearly the OP is worried about that. I however, having just the meager experience of, you know, actually fucking running the a Jellyfin server, am not. But I'm also not trying convince people I'm a smug cybersecurity expert with a decade of experience.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 28 minutes ago (1 children)

As OP should be. 2k attempts a day at unauthorized access to your services is a pretty clear indicator of that. Seems you’ve mitigated it well enough, why would you suggest that OP not bother doing the same? If you’re so convinced those 2k attempts are not malicious, then go ahead and remove those rules if they’re unnecessary.

Perhaps as someone with only meager experience running a Jellyfin server who can’t even recognize malicious traffic to their server, and zero understanding of the modern internet threat landscape, you shouldn’t be spreading misinformation that’s potentially damaging to new selfhosters?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 21 minutes ago (1 children)

If you were any good at reading, you would know that I said those rules protect the Authelia login page. They don't protect the Jellyfin service or its login page at all. The Jellyfin instance is not behind anything except Cloudflare. I stated that in my very first message. Removing those rules would have no effect whatsoever on Jellyfin.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 13 minutes ago (1 children)

It’s over man. You’ve made it very clear you have no idea what you’re talking about, how any of this works, or even what’s going on with your own selfhosted services. Back peddling away from your own arguments and trying to sweep up the beans you’ve already spilled isn’t going to help your case.

Maybe stick to your day job, I just don’t think that cybersecurity career is in the cards for you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 minutes ago

Yeah, some random nobody trying to convince people they're a cybersecurity expert is gonna be what shuts me up.

I very clearly laid out my setup, and how you were wrong. If you can't even read well enough to understand that, let alone form som kind of actual argument backed up by reality, that isn't my problem to deal with.

I would say stick to your own day job, but if this is actually your day job then maybe check out whether your local Burger King has openings, you'll do less harm there.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

I used to do all the things mentioned here. Now, I just use Wireguard. If a family member wants to use a service, they need Wireguard. If they don't want to install it, they dont get the service.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

Came here to say this. I use wireguard and it simply works.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

Pangolin could be a solution

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›