this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
111 points (94.4% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

4201 readers
210 users here now

Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and sexual cravings for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

For the other, slightly less political NCD, [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago

C'est l'âne de bets ça

[–] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

Has science gone too far?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

I await the GBU 51-1337 'Blumpkin'

[–] Coolbeanschilly 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I remember when I was a kid growing up in the 80's, there was a magazine that came in the fall around October that sold all kinds of odd novelty gifts. One of them was a cigarette dispenser in the shape of a donkey. You would pull the donkey ears forward, and the donkey would poop a cigarette. This graphic reminded me of it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbExKv587jk

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I believe this is the donkey from Worms (video game)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I prefer super sheep but the donkey was indeed the ultimate bunker buster.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Me too, super sheep are far more fun to use, and takes more skill. Can't go wrong with a long range hot with a banana either.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

You just reminded me of the challenges, mostly ninja rope and super sheep

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Hmm. The Wikipedia page is missing any mention of the nickname, but this military history fandom wiki has that nickname clearly documented, and it shows up again in a politico article.

Can't immediately tell if this is a failure of Wikipedia's documentation practices or a 'fact' that's been made up by less secure channels.

Really wish we could turn back the clock to when specialized webpages talking about a certain subject were in abundance.