https://browseraudit.com/results/79825/38c2442dff15c19cb783739f3ed775470163aa88
Fennec F-Droid Stable, 87.0.0-RC1.
A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox
https://browseraudit.com/results/79825/38c2442dff15c19cb783739f3ed775470163aa88
Fennec F-Droid Stable, 87.0.0-RC1.
https://browseraudit.com/results/79845/a8d85e2eeb9473e32d16acafdf9cd31a41a15708 Bromite (F-droid version), 90.0.4430.74
This is not more secure, this is about equal. There needs to be a much bigger difference to make this bold claim. Also comparing the nightly and canary releases is of little relevance. I use production approved releases on my system in general.
This is 3 years ago? Just pop up now.. :/
What a surprise \s
Haha
https://browseraudit.com/results/79846/f33b7c8e76950484eb77ef98c7eda99de1bc34eb 7 Criticals 20 Warnings, Version 90.0.4430.72 (Developer Build) built on Debian 11.0, running on Debian 11.0 (64-bit)
Firefox 88 results https://browseraudit.com/results/79850/45c92118adc60c3dbfc2fa1e182c96906a6423e7 Zero Criticals. firefox Installed: 88.0-1
Just tested Safari 16.4 and I got 404 passed, 27 warning, and 0 for both critical and skipped.
I also tested LibreWolf 114.0.1-2 and got 396 passed, 32 warnings, 0 critical, and 3 skipped.
and in other news, water is wet.