this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
500 points (98.3% liked)

Science Memes

11813 readers
183 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
500
T-testing (mander.xyz)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Probably some stressed RA: "how do they do these plots?... ah, screw this, I'll just put the T"

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hence "student T"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Spot on!!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Me trying to figure out how to use R

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

At least you don't need to use C

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (4 children)

That entire paper was wild

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The derivation of the OLS killed me. But other than that, does it look like a legit paper or is it some BS?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It would be really funny if they adjusted the vertical height properly though... :-D

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You could vary the font size of each T to make them the correct height. Real mad scientist shit.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

While making a drug monograph I found some faulty statistical analysis in a paper and emailed the author twice

They did not respond

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

T