this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
95 points (97.0% liked)

politics

19625 readers
3321 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Biden administration is urging Israel to rethink its plans for a major ground offensive in the Gaza Strip and instead to opt for a more “surgical” operation using aircraft and special operations forces carrying out precise, targeted raids on high-value Hamas targets and infrastructure, according to five U.S. officials familiar with the discussions.

Administration officials have become highly concerned about the potential repercussions of a full ground assault, the officials said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive diplomatic matters, and they increasingly doubt that it would achieve Israel’s stated goal of eliminating Hamas. They also are concerned that it could derail negotiations to release nearly 200 hostages, particularly as diplomats think they have made “significant” advances in recent days to free a number of them, potentially including some Americans, one of the officials said.

The Biden administration also is worried that a ground invasion could result in numerous casualties among Palestinian civilians as well as Israeli soldiers, potentially triggering a dramatic escalation of hostilities in the region, the officials said. U.S. officials think a targeted operation would be more conducive to hostage negotiations, less likely to interrupt humanitarian aid deliveries, less deadly for people on both sides and less likely to provoke a wider war in the region, the officials said.

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

That they felt the need for anonymity while speaking out against ethnic cleansing does not engender confidence that even handedness will win the day.

This monster was fed on dollars, and it should be threatened with a diet.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I like that US is keeping Israel in check. I do wish they'd do something about settlements in the West Bank as in armed peacekeeping forces aimed to protect people within West Bank. No Hamas, no settlements in the West Bank, defeat of Netanyahu in the next election, and a long trial of investigation of Netanyahu as well as collaborators. I don't know what to do about fundamental Islam, but I think a push to secular thinking among Middle East is needed, and even secular thinking should be more supported within Israel.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's no way the illegal settlement can be evicted without US forcing Israel to do so, and from the way US and Israel act in this war, it's highly unlikely that will happen.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hamas is not "fundamentalist Islam".

Not sure how you've managed to confuse them with the Taliban besides whatever your national programming is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Are you thinking of Fatah? Hamas are absolutely fundamentalist Islamists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I was thinking in context of Middle East as a whole, and yes, there's a issue of religious fundamentalism within Middle East.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

how about, you know, a ceasefire....

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

According to the post right above this in my feed, they're actually asking for that too!

Although they're using the weird term "humanitarian pause" in stead, it's extremely refreshing to see the US government pushing for the apartheid regime to stop with the genocide at least temporarily rather than the usual unconditional cheerleading!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Finally, an actual news source instead of someone's homemade blog pushing a political agenda!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Acting as if WaPo hasn't been pushing a pro-establishment politics agenda for looks at watch almost a century and a half 🙄

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The devil you know, right?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Except when the status quo that said devil wants to return to was so bad that it inspired a fascist uprising on the right and mass protests on the left.

That SHOULD make you more open to alternatives to the usual ways of doing things..

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


U.S. Defense Department officials recently dispatched a team of officers, including Marine Lt. Gen. James Glynn, to Israel to offer recommendations on how to carry out military operations in an urban environment.

Israel responded with a full siege of Gaza that has cut off food, water, electricity and fuel, as well as with an unrelenting air bombardment campaign that Palestinian health authorities say has killed more than 7,000 people, many of them children.

The Israeli siege and airstrikes in Gaza, a densely populated enclave of more than 2 million people, have led to a deepening humanitarian crisis, and the Biden administration is facing increasing pressure to respond to the growing reports of civilian suffering.

In the immediate aftermath of the Hamas attacks, many senior U.S. officials privately supported a massive Israeli response, which they viewed as necessary to deter Iran and Hezbollah from opening a second front in Israel’s north.

As Blinken met the leaders of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the Palestinian Authority, the Arab allies reinforced concerns that the civilian suffering and deaths were infuriating their domestic populations and raising the specter of mass instability.

Obama, writing in his 2020 memoir, “A Promised Land,” said Biden had “voiced his misgivings” about surging tens of thousands of troops to Afghanistan, counseling that doing so could plunge the United States deeper into a quagmire from which it would be difficult to extricate itself.


The original article contains 1,954 words, the summary contains 233 words. Saved 88%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!