AlolanVulpix

joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] AlolanVulpix 9 points 3 weeks ago

The separation of powers (executive, judicial, and legislative), are critically important for governance and democracy.

Branches of government must take care to not unduly influence other branches of government. The independence and impartiallity of the judiciary must be protected.

Also see: Former PC Party vice-president appointed as Ontario judge. Province appointed 2 former staffers to a committee that helps select provincial judges in February | CBC News

 

Abstract

Research suggests that the degree of democracy in countries is correlated with certain characteristics of its citizens. A question is whether different types of government (e.g., autocratic vs. democratic) are associated with specific personality dispositions and the well-being of citizens. We addressed this question with a sample of over 200,000 persons from 75 countries. Using structural equation modeling and a strong measurement invariance approach we tested the association between national government type (autocratic, hybrid, flawed democracy, full democracy) and citizens report of socially aversive (malevolent) versus affiliative (benevolent) traits. As governments varied from autocratic to full democracy there were lower malevolent traits and higher benevolent traits. Further, established quantitative democracy indices predicted higher benevolent and lower malevolent traits in the total sample, while only benevolent traits were strongly associated with well-being. The findings highlight associations between governments and personality traits and how democratic practices might influence the well-being of its citizens.

[–] AlolanVulpix 8 points 4 weeks ago

I'm not sure what the answer is to make them good-faith actors

Stick firmly to the facts. Don't get into emotional arguments, because it's a losing game. When discussing electoral reform, use hard data about vote percentages versus seat counts. Show how the system mathematically distorts representation for all parties including conservatives themselves. Present international examples where proportional systems work effectively. Keep bringing the conversation back to universal democratic principles rather than partisan advantage. When they make emotional arguments, respond with evidence, not matching rhetoric.

What's the non-extreme method of getting conservatives to stop hurting themselves and everyone around them?

Push for systems that punish bad behaviour. Proportional representation naturally discourages obstructionism because parties can't gain majority power with minority support. It creates structural incentives for cooperation and compromise rather than trying to change individuals' character or beliefs. Under PR, parties that refuse to work constructively become irrelevant because coalition-building becomes necessary. The system itself becomes the accountability mechanism, not partisan battles or public shaming. Electoral reform is the non-extreme solution because it works with human nature rather than against it.

[–] AlolanVulpix 3 points 4 weeks ago

How would MMP/STV handle a situation like this?

This issue falls out of the scope of these electoral systems. It's like asking "how would MMP/STV handle foreign interference", when neither MMP/STV are supposed to handle foreign interference. So, if what you really want to know is how local representation maintained regardless of electoral system, the answer is to have stronger rules and regulations surrounding elections. Particularly, banning "parachute" candidates, which are candidates that run in electoral districts of which they are not local to.

Can candidates running locally also be on the party list?

Under MMP, no. It would be like if a candidate was allowed to run in multiple electoral districts.

[–] AlolanVulpix 23 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

To all those who say local representation is important, so we must not implement proportional representation.

How does this justify Pierre Poilievre, who represented Carleton, Ontario, now potentially applying to be a candidate for an Alberta electoral district? This is halfway across the country.

Our current system does nothing particular for local representation.

 

Conservative MP-elect for Battle River-Crowfoot Damien Kurek, seen here during question period in 2023. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

Damien Kurek, the Conservative MP-elect for Battle River-Crowfoot, just announced he's stepping down to allow Poilievre to run in a by-election.

The riding, which Kurek has held since 2019, occupies a vast territory in Alberta between Calgary and Edmonton and has been a Conservative stronghold since it was created 10 years ago.

Kurek was first elected in the riding in 2019. In an emailed statement, Kurek said the decision is temporary, saying he'd hand over his seat to Poilievre "for the remainder of this Parliamentary session" and "run again here in Battle River-Crowfoot in the next general election."

It's unclear what that means for Poilievre afterward.

"Pierre Poilievre just finished a remarkable national campaign that received the highest vote share since 1988," Kurek said in the statement.

"An unstoppable movement has grown under his leadership, and I know we need Pierre fighting in the House of Commons to hold the Liberal minority government to account."

[–] AlolanVulpix 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

"Politics should not be a lifelong career, and elected officials should not be allowed to fix themselves in the halls of power of a nation... Therefore, I would institute a limit of two terms for members of Parliament" - Pierre Poilievre 1999

"Politics should not be a lifelong career, and elected officials should not be allowed to fix themselves in the halls of power of a nation... Therefore, I would institute a limit of two terms for members of Parliament" - Pierre Poilievre 1999

[–] AlolanVulpix 7 points 1 month ago

And under our current winner-take-all system, we'll have that soon unless we do something about it.

[–] AlolanVulpix 8 points 1 month ago

I'm pivoting in other ways that either advance PR or civics! The Fair Vote community is in a good place with the work we've done so far!

[–] AlolanVulpix 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Any for-profit organization (e.g. Globe & Mail and Toronto Star) can be acquired simply by buying shares. We've seen this with the Hudson Bay, for example.

The featured media outlets in the infographic are either government owned, or non-profit. You can't acquire the government, and a non-profit structure doesn't have shareholders.

 

SmartVoting.ca on Bluesky

CPC takes two from the LPC in our latest update. But the Conservative vote continues to weaken nationwide meaning more is up for grabs.

FEDERAL SEAT PROJECTION

  • LPC: 189 (218)
  • CPC: 122 (86)
  • BQ: 23 (25)
  • NDP: 8 (11)
  • GPC: 1 (3)
  • PPC: 0 (0)

April 22, 2025 | MOE: +/- 10

#cdnpoli #election #canada

 

Media Ecosystem Observatory on Bluesky

With Meta’s news ban still in place, many Canadians are now completely missing traditional media in their feeds. @abridgman.bsky.social warns this could lead to “less broad understanding of politics and more hyper-focused issue orientations," : www.france24.com/en/live-news...

 

Fair Vote Canada 🗳️🍁 on Bluesky

Glad to see commitments from @canadiangreens.bsky.social and @ndp.ca to proportional representation!

With rising authoritarianism, our democracy is too important to leave to politicians elected with just 30–40% support.

Ask your candidates where they stand, and vote accordingly.

#cdnpoli

Text titled “A Voting System That Works” outlines the Green Party’s electoral reform commitments. It states that the current system is unfair and millions of votes don’t count. Their proposed changes include adopting proportional representation, lowering the voting age to 16, restoring the per-vote subsidy to support smaller parties, and creating a Citizens' Assembly to guide reforms. Text titled “Putting an end to unfair elections” outlines the NDP’s plan to fix Canada’s voting system. It criticizes the current system as outdated and unfair, and blames the Liberals for broken promises. The NDP pledges to make the 2025 election the last under the current system and promises to establish an independent Citizens' Assembly to implement a Mixed-Member Proportional system in time for the next federal election.

 

London North Centre GPO/ London Centre GPC on Bluesky

Today is Earth Day. If you didn't vote yet, then consider the future of young Canadians when casting your ballot. While there are many immediate issues affecting people, we need significant climate change mitigation efforts now. Ignore vote splitting arguments & vote GREEN for a better environment.

Our @canadiangreens.bsky.social candidates are: London Centre, @maryannhodge.bsky.social; London West, Jeff Vanderzwet and Middlesex-London, Jim Johnston. Vote for change; vote Green!

 

Media Ecosystem Observatory on Bluesky

AI now lets users generate fake images of politicians, but the risks are clear.

@abridgman.bsky.social warns about the dangers of AI-driven disinformation in this election: www.cbc.ca/news/canada/...

view more: ‹ prev next ›