CaptnNMorgan

joined 2 years ago
[–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

But then they'll have to replace them more often. Unless this is referring to commercial fishing. My first thought was for people trying to feed their kids, but while I was writing I realized the big fishing companies are way more likely to be close to 100% responsible

[–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

What is the context of this comment? It seems like you're ignoring the article, but if you know something I don't, I'm all ears.

[–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait, that was today?! Why the fuck is the date not posted everywhere? I've been seeing things about it happening, but didn't know it was today until I'm going home from work. Why isn't my Lemmy feed filled with simple images containing the date and a few words to describe it??? Y'all cared more about the reddit blackout than stoping fascism

[–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Not even comparable😂 Americans look back at this and laugh or cringe, Brits still eat their old-timey slop

[–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Maybe "worse" in the sense of health, but certainly not taste.

[–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Because now, there are better alternatives.

If someone was too poor to afford a hoop and stick, I bet they wished they could have played with one, as a kid, even when they're fully grown. That doesn't mean, they would go out and buy a hoop and stick as an adult to play with, when ball in a cup is the current superior game. At the same time, someone who actually did play with the hoop and stick as a child, would probably prefer to play with that as an adult, even though the ball in a cup exists

[–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

You would need at least an entire hive, the rules state only one animal. But if you got a Queen, you probably could control an entire hive🤔 you've given me something to think about for sure

[–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I just want to be ready, in case everyone else chooses violence.

If, all of a sudden, there were a handful of people that had a magical connection with an otherwise dangerous animal; I imagine, either those people would fight each other or team up against someone with a robot army. Either way, a tiger would have a lot of weak points, even with armor.

[–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Assuming their domesticated enough to listen to my commands and ignore their pray drive, on like a magical level, Tiger. Hands down. I would go to the Renaissance Fair with them and commission a blacksmith to forge armor for them. I would ride it into battle whenever necessary.

Edit: I was also assuming no one else has a magically domestic animal. If everyone in this thread also has one, I'll choose Rhinoceros

[–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Would be helpful to people who currently don't know, and to people in the future, if you link to the Thursday night massacre of the doj, Google only showed me articles talking about the Friday one

[–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Dalmatian are usually way more aggressive than pits.They're a lot more rare than pits, so the statistics wouldn't show that, but I've been in the dog grooming industry for almost 4 years and Dalmatian are WAY more likely to be crazy.

It's never been about the breed, some people just shouldn't have dogs.

Is it scarier when a pitbull snaps, than when a Chihuahua snaps? Absolutely! But if your dog snaps at people and other dogs, it doesn't matter what breed it is, if you aren't willing to train them to not snap, you're a bad dog owner!

This thread is full of racist people who think it's okay to be openly racist when it's not about humans. If your dog was killed by a pit and you blame the dog instead of the owner, guess what? You're an idiot and you were probably a bad dog owner too. Some people get lucky and don't have to do anything for their dog to behave, but that doesn't mean they're good owners.

 

I apologize if this isn't the place, I'll happily repost somewhere else if someone gives any suggestions pertaining to that.

I've been using Eddie with airvpn on my PC for a little over two years. I have never been able to identify which programs are using my network with task manager, because all the traffic went through openvpn.exe.

I just switched to wireguard thinking it would help me figure out which programs are using so much data but it provides even less information. It's significantly faster, so I'll be sticking to wireguard, but I still can't tell which program is actually using the network on task manager. I've been googling all morning and can't find a proper solution to my problem. It definitely seems like others want the same thing, but I haven't found any thread where the people answering actually understood the issue.

Task manager shows all traffic is going through wireguard.exe or airvpn.exe, so how can I tell which programs are actually using data?

view more: next ›