No.
I'm referring to the multiple ceasefires and his decision to ice Netanyahu out of some of those discussions due to his intractability.
And yes, it's still a poor record, but it's better than Joe Biden or Barack Obama, who jumped however high they were commanded to by Benjamin Netanyahu.
Totally, man.
I'm the problem.
The wild thing is, the headline is objectively correct. (But really, no US president ever deserves a NPP.)
Just look at the other NPP presidential recipients:
Barack Obama had a kill list, a gulag at Gitmo, and was dropping bombs on seven different countries during his presidency. Jimmy Carter's hands were blood-soaked, especially in Southeast Asia. Woodrow Wilson got us roped into WWI, where millions died over a literal few meters of terrain. Teddy Roosevelt got us roped into the Spanish-American War and whined that the US didn't involve itself in WWI early enough.
Whether you like him or not, Donald got us out of Syria and Afghanistan, and while definitely doing so for the wrong reasons, he's done more to try and resolve the genocide in Palestine than anyone since Clinton.
The first time I ever used it I got a bugged response. I asked it to give me a short summary of the 2022 Super Bowl, and it told me Patrick Mahomes won the Super Bowl with a field goal kick.
Now, those two things separately are true. Mahomes won. The game was won on a field goal.
The LLM just looks at the probability that the sentences it's generating are correct based on its training data, and it smashed two correct statements together thinking that was the most probable reasonable response.
It does that a lot. Don't use GenAI without checking its output.
Democrats had options.
Remember Marianne Williamson?
Democrats were all like, nah, give me the guy with evident public dementia instead.
Same, and it's a shame that the Dems can't fail hard enough to get the ideologues to do anything differently.
I'm not sure where you've been recently, but it seems pretty apparent that if you're a president with control of Congress, you can fundamentally change American's culture and governance systems in mere months.
Unless they're an economic populist.
Then it's all: "Nope, not like that." from your local Democratic ideologues.
In almost every case it's because they were indoctrinated at an early age. Feels like child abuse to me, but since the vast majority of people are Christians in most countries, it's considered a-okay.
I don't care what the international child r*** ring has to say about the gays.
Good.
Everyone should be tearing apart Democrats now. They handed over their only leverage when they decided not to shut down Donald's government and they've shown, as always, enthusiastic participation in letting fascists rule unencumbered.
After all, they're getting richer off this bullshit too.
Just wait until we crack open an American history book for you, friend.
It's going to be illuminating.
The point here isn't that Donald is a good, virtuous leader. It's that US foreign policy and every former president have set the bar so low for peace that Donald can do all this shit and he's still better-qualified for an NPP by virtue of the fact that he actively ended several wars during his first term.