FundMECFSResearch

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

For sure I’d say completely failing. Have you seen the rise of the RN and AFD and FPÖ who are all basically Putin assets?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It’s funny because I’ve specifically gotten multiple removal reasons from Hexbear after saying something like. “I’d prefer to live in neither authoritarian China or the US”

and I’ll get a removal reason like: “False. What credible sources have said the people’s republic is authoritarian? US State Department doesn’t count”.

Which strikes me as super weird cuz I never mentioned the state department myself.

Glad I’m on an instance without Hexbear, at this point.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (6 children)

If it fits the narrative, it doesn’t matter if it’s real or not. Apparently.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (4 children)

A bit rich given the EU is completely failing themselves. I mean look at Italy, Austria, Germany, France.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My genetics:

Are you seriously gonna have the shits because your stresses. Yes.

[–] [email protected] 100 points 4 days ago (4 children)

This is what I mean when I say Kant (and other enlightenment era thinkers) obsession with some universal moral rules followed by purely rational humans is some dude’s fantasy who never has understood how normal people work.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Sure, but “no one’s perfect” in the way you use it just ends up dismissing and sidelining valid criticism.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 4 days ago

But you can support these people without supporting their corrupt and violent government?

I stand for solidarity with all peoples, not their rulers.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 days ago (4 children)

You can’t just reply that to dismiss value criticism.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Texaska can’t hurt, it isn’t real.

Texaska

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Recursive Texas

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Doesn’t really work. It’s a lot of cognitive strain to resituate yourselt within it that my body doesn’t have.

(I’m kinda suprised you thought I never would have considered that though 😂, like it’s the most basic thing to try).

 

Are these three statements true:

(1) We can observe where A hits (thereby seeing A as a particle instead of a wave) before B’s path determines the availability of information?

(2) Measuring where A hits, (even if done with thousands of previous data points of A sorted by B hits showing the interference patterns) has no predictive power over whether B’s whichpath information will be erased or not?

(3) Whether or not B’s whichpath information was erased, has predictive power over where A landed?

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/30756980

Oh really?

In a user manual I came across recently.

 
437
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Alt Text:

there is a stairway to heaven and a guy in a wheelchair saying fucking dick

Original Post

 
 
 
 
5
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
view more: ‹ prev next ›