GrammarPolice

joined 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 minutes ago

What can i say🤷

[–] [email protected] 1 points 34 minutes ago* (last edited 34 minutes ago)

I guess so, if there were to be a socialist revolution right now, I'd probably be in support, but it doesn't mean I'd think it was necessary. I'm a progressive and i don't necessarily oppose radical overhaul, i just think reform is satisfactory.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 42 minutes ago* (last edited 41 minutes ago) (3 children)

If you keep up this ultra-left purism, we'll never build broad coalitions. If the only acceptable leftists are those who fit a rigid ideological mold, then the left will always remain politically weak and fractured while the right consolidates power. Politics is about power, not being correct! You sound like a Bolshevik.

Have fun with your circlejerk.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 52 minutes ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 55 minutes ago* (last edited 54 minutes ago) (5 children)

This stuff again about "true-left" and what not. Framing all liberals as part of the problem ignores the bigger picture. I agree that liberals have often been weak in confronting fascism, and some have even enabled it, but they’re not monolithic. Many liberal voters are just politically disengaged or confused about what’s happening. If you just write them off as enemies, you're pushing them closer to reactionaries rather than pulling them toward the left. Anybody that opposes "right-wingism" is good enough of a leftist to me. The real question is how do we win them over instead of letting the right absorb them?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

"progressive" liberals are people who are moved by injustice more than by defending private property.

I completely agree with your categorization of progressive liberals which is why i said the progressive movement doesn't strike me as caring too much about private property. Except if it means more people gain rights like you said.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (7 children)

This is a myopic analysis of why the fascists are in power. The left as a whole is responsible for pushing the fascists to power because of their inability to settle on a common agenda. Some leftists are more concerned with social justice, some with the worries of the working class and some with capitalism entirely.

This blaming of one particular ideological group for why the right were able to usurp power is part of the problem. Looking for who to blame instead of looking for a solution that all leftists can agree on.

Note: When i refer to the left, I'm talking about liberals, progressives, social democrats and the far left ideologies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (10 children)

How are liberals rewriting history if i may ask?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 hour ago (12 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

Progressives never struck me as sharing the spirit of change with socialism. The progressive movement always felt - to me - an attempt at drawing more attention to social issues. In other words, the core of the progressive movement is based on social issues.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I died laughing in class😂

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 hours ago (15 children)

Based off of current goings-on, this is factual. Constant internal battles about who's the true leftist while ignoring the real enemy

 
 
 

As the year wraps up, share some of the challenges you faced and how you're dealing/you've dealt with it.

Killed can be interpreted as either metaphorical or literal.

 

I've been consuming a lot of political content on both sides lately, but there's one thing that seems to be common among the Republicans. They always point out Kamala's shortcomings as a way to justify Trump's right to be president. They constantly bring up Kamala's wavering stances on fracking, the fact she hasn't been to the border, and a lot of other stuff. And i just think to myself "okay, so what? She's lied. So has Trump though". Why are republicans making it sound like Trump hasn't lied even moreso than Kamala?

Maybe the things Kamala lies about are so terrible? I really don't know. Maybe I'm just too biased. Am i missing something?

 

Suck it up. You have to go back to wage slaving. That's the irony of life. Everyone's getting mad that they're not the ones profiting off of this and coping by saying that the joke is getting stale.

Just stop fucking hating and be happy for the other person. If you're pissed off, you have some serious introspection to do.

 

This has to be against some kind of law right?

 
 
192
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Google's AI may replace traditional websites and content creators leading to potential monopolization and diminishing user experience - Mrwhosetheboss

view more: next ›