Ok. again Im trying my best here but maybe im just not finding what you find from google searching. Nothing like an an original article in its entirety is coming up for me.
Im not disagreeing im saying its not anything that invalidates and its from some offhand internet comments so its not something I can look through. I am engaging and looking through the material. Besides what I put before currently am looking at these but its not like your giving me direct links your just giving me your generalities. https://climatefeedback.org/evaluation/guardian-story-on-climate-impacts-of-diet-gets-mixed-reviews-from-scientists-damian-carrington/ https://ourworldindata.org/faqs-environmental-impacts-food
none of thatwould invalidate it though. Disparate methodologies can be normalized. Almost no studies could be compare or correlated otherwise. express direction of authors just sound dramy to me. and then a faux pa. the article still seems to be about co2 to me as well so maybe im not reading it right.
are you asking me to judge their methodology because it is way out of my field. Again though what I am seeing of critiques themselves have issues I can see and if I see something I no is not correct like the animal feed thing then I discount the whole critique because I do not feel I can trust it. As for other sources I can say going back I can find thes about conversion https://awellfedworld.org/feed-ratios/ and its source material in most cases is industry information.
The only things im finding so far is real bullshit. Claims of soy and corn grown for human used and the cows just getting the waste when we grow specifically feed corn. Im still looking for some legitimate critique article.
I feel there should be earlier things as I swear I saw similar things before 2010. Im looking into poore-nemecek but im not sure if its even the same thing as it seems to be about co2 and global warming as opposed to water usage or calorie usage.
Im sorta wondering if the fake egg might become cheaper than eggs.
You should check out the site archive as the shirt has changed over the years in the way its drawn but Im like pretty sure she mentioned it as the bat symbol at some point. I could be wrong though as there are like 10 to 15 years of comics in the archives.
I mean I have never looked into the studies that are the basis for the data but while I think its possible in the details I really doubt the overall would be wrong. Water usage and calorie wise it pretty much falls in line with smaller animals using less for each calorie. I really doubt people are hyping crickets capability to convert plants into cricket vs cows making plants into cow. Its common sense enough that Im not looking to determining how well the studies were done as I don't do that for most things as most people don't who still work a job enough to eat and such. Conversely if you know about bad studies I would not mind you giving me what you have. I have just done a quick search using terms like misleading and scam and such and nothing seems to come up.
Im almost sure they do unless something has changed. Its like every time you listen to a song on a streaming service it adds to the amount the artist gets even if its the same song by them multiple times.
they are the provider but not necessarily the content creator. I mean maybe apple bankrolled ted laso I honestly don't know. Also im not so sure the sytems are smart enough to not pay itself to advertise itself because from my experience I could completely see this happening.
Ugh. Got an interiew today and my brain woke me up way early. Taking 20 mins because I can't get back to sleep to reset. Anyway funny comic although im a long hair type that has not parted my hair since maybe early high school.
This is a kid type of thing that Im pretty distant from. Still when talking with my brother on the phone its funny to hear the background antics. Why are you mad? Whats gotten you so mad?
Rollover says I just want to scroll videos. I would suggest loops but im have not used it and am not sure if it ever got to the point where it is federated.
So the roll over text on this is: the grass is always greener and made of candy. This is pushing me to want to look over old ones for roll over text but man I am someone who is not big on rewatching, rereading things.
Not much to comment. I mean that meme coin had a lot of activity before tiktok seemed to decide things would go their way. I have a bit of story on the name obit. I think thats the husbands name and have never encountered it before but low and behold im talking to someone who mentions a guy they know with the same name. See though I assumed it was some sort of ethnic thing but the ethnicities seem to be about as different as you could get. So my friend mentions its a biblical name and im like. oh. guess that explains it.
I don't know how the decision to do double size ones come about. Crafting is sorta the closest I can come to art outside of creative writing.
Ok. So I just notice with this one that the hover over text, at least for this one, is different than the authors notes on the site. Ugh. Im a bit to lazy to go back through comics and see them but if anyone starts doing an archive dive you may want to look for it. I know she did not do a whol lot of authors notes until close to when she got married but they popped up here and there. Then at some point there consistantly is some comment. I should also mention I call them authors notes but they sometimes seem to be the artist and sometimes her husband although I think when its the husband he always puts his name to show its from him.
This seems to be around the artist as hero/idol thing and people of talent sometimes lacking character. Its always been a tough thing for me honestly. I like to think they are completely separate and the art stands on its own but its far easier to do when the artist is dead and not making any money off their creations anymore. It also greatly depends on how bad the stuff they did was. Some stuff to me is sorta a hype hate and others are legitimately eeewwww.
So my wife has a variety of medical issues and she basically tries to do what she can and I basically do stuff in order of what is most immediately needed to get done that she can't get to. With obviously work (or currently looking for work) being priority given the whole paycheck and health insurance thing. She prioritizes things I do not do well so her top thing is cooking if she can because if its up to me its likely going to be like a frozen pizza.
do you have a link to that.? I don't get how you expect me to do this if you don't think I use a search engine to find it.