IMALlama

Sankey

Sounds like a fun trip!

and used my 15 year old REI Chrysalis solo tent for the first time in a while. It continues to hold up

A lot of our camping gear is seriously old. A Coleman fuel stove and lantern from the 70s, which still works although TBH propane is somewhat appealing.

Our tent is the same tent I used as a kid - a "3 person" dome from Eastern Mountain Sports, which was basically a smaller scale REI store. The tent must be pushing 30 and is still going pretty strong. It's held up really well to some pretty serious wind and rain on a few occasions too - much better than the newer tents of some of my friends. I low key dread having to eventually replace it.

Our kids are old enough to start camping with us soon, so it's about to see it's third generation.

Great read, with some amusing asides.

Shots fired!

We probably have the same model - the one with the big oval stand. Every once in a while I wish it was OLED and/or higher resolution, but it's not worth the expensive or all the modern "features" such as these.

You know this, but I'll say it anyway. Discharging = heat and an implementation with no fan will probably result in shorter component life. Granted, someon else could use a quieter fan or a heat sync big enough to not necessitate active cooling.

If you're feeling adventurous, up size those resistors with through hole variety and offset them from the PCB so they get a bit more airflow.

Let us know what you end up with!

Not OP, but wanted to chime in.

I get the sentiment Some Gen Xers did grow up with home computers. However, I suspect those people are outliers due to both the cost and general user friendlyness. In the late 90s it seemed like everyone had a home computer, even the normies. This let their kids grow up messing around

It almost seems like we're heading back in this direction, where normies have moved on to phones and tablets because they "just work". I don't think the average kid will grow up as immersed in computers as I did unless their parents are intentionally about making that introduction. I bought my kid a used Thinkpad for Christmas last year. Most of his peers have tablets or just stick to their smartphone.

Agree, but also - what if they aren't declined and that's just the way they were all along?

I have a coworker who's a total idea factory, but struggles to communicate their ideas clearly. They've found LLMs grestly help writing their ideas in a way others can understand.

TBH, I am not that fond of the idea. After all, if a LLM can write what I do there's not really a need for me. But I also wonder if I'm gatekeeping a bit. Even if I have a hard time empathizing with the situation, I understand that we all have different strengths and weaknesses. Maybe they're just using a LLM to help fill in one of their weaknesses?

It's probably either a long exposures or a bunch of stacked exposures to get decently even lighting.

These units are somewhat silly IMO. It all comes down to volumetric flow. Big nozzle + thick extrusions + thick layers would probably mean needing to print slower than that speed due to the ability of a hot end to melt the filament.

/ someone who has been mm^3/s constrained for a while now

For quite some time now, Marlin has been the firmware of choice for any kind of custom 3D printer, with only Klipper offering some serious competition in the open-source world

Confused Voron noises

It does seem like an interesting concept, but I wonder how much benefit it will have, both in tuning effort and final outcome.

Get your self a "fast" lens and you'll be back to hand holding pretty quickly. Granted, you'll lose depth of field so this may not work for every shot. Prime lenses are your best bet here. f/1.4 should be plenty but f/1.8 or even f/2 will do.

You can use the exposure information from the photos you took to play the "if I had a faster lens, what kind of ISO and shutter speed could I get away with". The zoo lights photos I posted a few days ago in one of my comments were hand held.

EV calculator

That seems like a lot of damage for one week, but I guess anything is possible.

In general, plants don't like sudden changes to their environment. That's why you should gradually introduce indoor plants to sunlight if you move them outdoors - you'll give them sunburn. I suspect the same is true for roots. I keep my orchids in bark and let them dry out some between waterings. I suspect if their roots were suddenly moist 24/7 they wouldn't be too happy about it.

I hate to link reddit, but more info found here