You cannot, and that's why that type declaration models a NonEmpty that a type checker can enforce
Kache
joined 2 years ago
I think it's unfortunately a tragedy of the commons/prisoner's dilemma problem
Simplifying, a single store is not going to be able to improve pay for all the underpaid members of society, but what they can do is run thinner margins while staying in business (pay employees less, spend more on security, etc). Paying only their own employees more also does little to reduce the overall chances of theft.
Perhaps a better global equilibrium exists at higher wage rates, but there are limited options at local levels. For low-end wages, I think the downward pressure exceeds the upward wage pressure of the "free market" b/c the negotiation is between someone making a less profit vs someone failing to make a living -- the negotiating power is not balanced. This is why IMO minimum wage to some degree is important.
Perhaps a lighter/reflective color can keep its temperature lower for longer if you think you might leave it lying under the sun? Overheating damages the battery
If you want to entertain having kids, you need to be ready for a radical shift in your life priorities. Your kids will take priority over just about everything -- often even yourself. They'll take priority over your parents entirely, let alone your personal relationship with them.
First, are the practical and logistical aspects of your life at all dependent on your parents? I.e. are you fully independent? You will need to be and then some, you're going to entertain having kids.
Once you're fully independent and additionally have resources to spare (time, effort, money, space, etc, usually b/c you're with a partner you can trust and rely on), then choosing to have kids means starting your own family -- not your parents' family.
If the grandparents are supportive and helpful, that's great! They're extremely welcome to contribute to your kids' lives (and lighten some of your parenting load!)
However, if they're negatively impacting you or esp your kids, then they can lose that privilege. Again, your priority will be your kids. If this is a real concern for you, you'll need to factor it into your "ready to have a kid" considerations.
Hm, that's kind of interesting
But my first reaction is that optimizations only at the "Python processing level" are going to be pretty limited since it's not going to have metadata/statistics, and it'd depend heavily on the source data layout, e.g. CSV vs parquet
What's hard about vanilla Ruby?
What kind of query optimization can it for scanning data that's already in memory?
What did you go over?
No so much that YAGNI falls short, but more like "When YAGNI means 'You Are Gonna Need It'"
Bad abstraction is worse than no abstraction
If the code is going to poorly organized, I'd prefer it to just be one single gigantic standalone script than some wrong and misleading arrangement of objects or functions that adds more complexity than they solve
That depends, people can be smart but malicious, non-coorperative, or selfish.
The prisoner's dilemma shows that there are systems where individually, the "smart" individual thing to do is globally non-optimal.
Even smartness and altruism alone isn't enough. Medical professionals are smart and out to help others, but any ER doc/nurse will tell you they have limited trust in their patients (rightly so in the real world).
Does "everyone is smart" also include both "altruism and cooperative trust in others"?
Then tell her the only way to log in is via email magic login links?
Edit wait that won't work, some services send "password reset links" that don't log you in