Olhonestjim

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Akshually it's called a frunk like anybody gives a shit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

I think that rural living should exist and so should high density city living, so long as there are no landlords. However suburbia is the big problem. Those neighborhoods should be returned to the earth.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

If the people who lived in apartment buildings automatically co-owned the building, and landlords were illegal, then I'd be OK with it. Suburbs should be illegal. Everywhere people live should look and operate like downtowns. Healthy small businesses right below attractive apartments and all beautiful architecture.

But I also don't think people should be prevented from living in rural, even isolated areas. Some of us simply are unsuited for it. But it shouldn't be illegal. Only extreme wealth, landlords and owning more than, say, 3 nice houses should be illegal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

M-m-muh both sides!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Just because it's the most efficient way for all of us to live doesn't mean it's good for us. There are too many humans for this planet to support. We need to reduce the population ethically. Stop having kids.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

They aren't predators. They're parasites.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

All I have is a couple dozen gallons of gasoline. But it'll do more good on him than in my truck.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

That's our money, every penny.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

If you care so much Marc, prove it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Yep, seems the safer gamble to me. At least I'll be happier than renting.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

And why should I be confident that any of that is going to survive the next 4 years?

I'm not afraid of risk. I just spent the last month watching a couple of the world's worst narcissists disassemble my government with ease so that they could loot us for every penny they can steal. They're trying to kill every agency that benefits the public, including the one where I get my healthcare. These men are unfit to manage a fast food joint, but now they've got the planet's #1 nuclear power by the throat. I weighed the probabilities and the penalties, then made my decision. I'd rather have the money now. I no longer expect to grow old.

Why should I be confident that our recent economy will survive? I pulled my money out before they could collapse the entire house of cards. I'm now in the process of buying remote land with a house on it. I plan to put up a few greenhouses and raise chickens and goats. I'll provide shelter to persecuted people in need. Try to live solarpunk while we can.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

It was. Is there a good reason why I should be confident that the money will still be there IF I get to retire? Should I expect even to live that long? I feel it's better invested in a house and land out near the middle of nowhere.

39
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

It might slide into the doorframe with a sci-fi hiss and recognize your approach to unlock, but it's a 100% manual, electric sliding door. If you walk out of your basic apartment and don't manually close the door when you leave, it WILL be open when you get back. It'll stay open the whole time you're home. Who ever saw a manual, powered, sliding door? If you didn't realize this was a dystopia, there you go. That's hysterical. I wonder if they set it up so you'd get burglarized for neglecting basic security. And if not, why not?!

Whoever thought that up is an evil genius.

view more: next ›