Peruvian_Skies

The Amish work hard and grow their own crops. Sovcits don't actually produce any value, they just spend their time dreaming up ways to access all that secret money they were somehow born with.

Also they spent 40 years wandering in a desert that takes less than a year to cross on foot.

It's because if you think you're gay and kiss the same gender then discover you weren't actually gay, you become tainted forever and upon death your soul turns into a cold sore in someone's mouth instead of going to the Promised Land to play the harp with everyone else. Or something that makes about as much sense as that.

You're absolutely correct. Some people "just know" and stay thay way, some "just know" and change, and some take a while to find out. There is absolutely no reason why that should be a problem.

My brother knew he wanted to be a doctor when he was five and he stuck with it. I'm 36 and I still wonder if I chose the right profession. Why is this considered normal for what you want to work with but not who you want to be with?

They're just expressing an opinion. Cool it.

Apart from Australia and New Zealand, the Southern hemisphere houses pretty much just the poorest countries. Poverty also correlates strongly with average temperature, so it increases as you approach the Equator from either side (oil-rich Sultanates included, since the countries are rich but the people are still poor).

For what it's worth, many people here in Brazil use the phrase "global south" as a better alternative to "third world", an expression which no longer makes sense since the fall of the USSR, and I haven't ever seen anyone on the Left here be offended or bothered by it.

Untrue. Most don't engage in actual philantropy at all, but donate only to causes that will directly benefit their bottom line, such as sectors that depend on their products, or for scholarships in fields where their companies hire heavily. That isn't actually donating. It's just tax-exempt investing. In this sense, Gates is a cut above other billionaires.

His actions merit a freshly sharpened blade on his guillotine. Musk can have the rusty one that we'll need to drop thrice to get the job done.

That's a separate point. As long as the result benefits people, the motivation doesn't matter. Gates's problem isn't that he helps fight disease for the wrong reasons. His problem is that he hoards more wealth than anyone could ever need and only helps with a small fraction of the resources he could help with if he really wanted to. But if his tax evasion saves people from painful death by disease, I say it's a good thing. Most billionaires evade taxes without saving anyone else from anything.

Gates deserves a guillotine with a freshly sharpened and well lubricated blade. Musk deserves a rusty blade that will need to be dropped thrice to get the job done.

Money would also attract grifters who want to create fake scandals for the payoff. I agree with you that there is absolutely some reprehensible shit going down behind closed doors at Xitter, and at Meta too for that matter, but if Gates or anyone else offered a financial incentive to come forward, finding something that actually happened amid all the reports they received would be like finding a needle in a haystack blindfolded and without a magnet. Especially now that everybody has access to several LLMs to write the fake scandal reports for them. Yes, most would be easy to identify as fake, but someone would still have to take the time to read them. So-called AI detectors aren't worth anything.

But then wouldn't it be easier for those software engineers to just deploy it themselves and keep all the money? What value is the buyer providing?

What is meant by Ransomware as a Service, as opposed to regular old Ransomware?

I came here to say this. If I have only a 7% chance of recovering my data after paying, I'm better off not paying.