Prunebutt

Its got all of it and its free and legal

...but how?

Gemacht meinen Tag (⁀ᗢ⁀)

Here's an actual AI evangelist/researcher making a point how open source can't apply to neural networks (or LLMs)

Edit: Also, I'm not talking about the assets. I'm tal*ing about the ability to recreate. If you have the Doom assets, you can build it yourself.

Are you serious?

I don't know where I read it, but i think the devs of Rollerdome want you to pirate it anyway, since the publisher screwed them over and they don't get anything out of sold copies.

Still: Really shitty from a game conservation standpoint.

Ich hätte es früher "Luigi strategie" genannt. Aber mittlerweile würde man damit meinen, dass Scholz seine Klassenkämpferischen Wurzeln entdeckt und mit ner 3D gedruckten Knifte CEOs wegbämmst.

Mir hat mal wer die Kurzfassung von Das Kapital von Otto Rühle empfohlen. Und ich hab gutes gehört von "Das ABC des Kapitalismus".

Ich selber hab mir den Kram nur über Youtubevideos reingepfiffen. XD

You can read all the other comments which explained why it is not open source. You can't really retrain the model without petabytes of data. Even if you "train" stuff on your dataset: it's more like tweaking the model weights a bit, rather than building the model from scratch.

"Open source" is PR talk by Meta and deepseek.

Just regurgitating propaganda.

No u.

Communism is defined by worker control of the means of production

No, that's socialism. Communism is a stateless, classless, moneyless society.

Also, the workers in China aren't in control of the means of production. The bureaucrats and capitalists are.

That’s how they lifted 800 million people out of poverty

While I applaud the better living standards: I see no contradiction to capitalism. Marx himself wrote:

The bourgeoisie, during its rule of scarce one hundred years, has created more massive and more colossal productive forces than have all preceding generations together. Subjection of Nature’s forces to man, machinery, application of chemistry to industry and agriculture, steam-navigation, railways, electric telegraphs, clearing of whole continents for cultivation, canalisation of rivers, whole populations conjured out of the ground — what earlier century had even a presentiment that such productive forces slumbered in the lap of social labour?

Simply participating in markets does not make a country capitalist

No, but state ownership of the means of production makes a country state capitalist.

Let's come back to your initial point: you accused me of dismissing an LLM, because it is "communist". Comrade, I'm an anarcho-communist. I dislike all the hypetrain riding, water gobbling sharlatans in the current so-called "AI" bubble: Altman, Pashaj (don't know how to write him), Zuckerberg and Musk. I like it if the market get disrupted, but I don't like it if the AI trend continues to wreak havoc on nature.

Btw: how is deepseek "energy efficient"?

And also: All that has squat to do with open source or not.

I was specifically addressing the use of the phrase "open source". And the term "open data" doesn't apply either, since it's not a dataset that's distributed, but rather weights of an LLM with data baked into it. That's neither open source nor open data.

I'm not into gambling and know that the house always wins.