Wont let me read the article
Renegade
Which comment?
So it's not just an unlucky mistake. Its not just a poorly designed deployment process. They ignored actual smaller scale failures.
This interview it's wild
Washington has fairly strong whistleblower protections. Even if I was disposed toward taking retaliation against somebody in that situation, and I’m not, I’d be very remiss to do that in the state of Washington.
Um wat
So is this what Mozilla meant when they announced a privacy push back in February
How's it compare to greenshot?
In short, yes, i support those other things.
... but back to the geo engineering are you saying that we aren't on the brink yet? Are you saying its not that bad?
That I don't understand why we're not doing more of those two things. Geo engineering seams to have strong opposition even within climate activist circles, and nuclear power use is on the decline.
Disaster is nearing. Mass displacement. Mass starvation. Mass death. It is all imminent. Do you understand?
That sound really bad. So then I have a couple questions.
- do you support new nuclear power? How about if the plant will be built near where you live?
- do you support Geo-engineering testing?
... if no then how could the consequences of that be worse then mass death and starvation?
California has pushed out badly worded laws in the past. Here's a definition from the bill.
“Artificial intelligence model” means an engineered or machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs that can influence physical or virtual environments and that may operate with varying levels of autonomy.
Tell me that wouldn't also apply to a microwave oven.
Title is misleading. Bridge was damaged by flooding. Use of google maps appears to be speculation. There is no clarity in the article on whether enough time had elapsed for officials or google to know about the damage.