Shareni

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, it's an IBM ThinkPad, it is slow. Linux just makes it usable.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You should have been added after like a century of constantly invading countries, funding extremists, setting up "revolutions" promoting their puppets, causing genocide, and doing war crimes nobody can persecute you for. Who needs zionisists when the entire country is a temple to unrestricted capitalism run by oligarchs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Prolly cowboy bebop

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago

What part is confusing you?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Meanwhile nix install instructions start of with a curl

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You do realise Europe is a continent, and not a country? Hungary has been pretty openly far right for a long time

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I agree with you, but we aren't corpo assholes. And those changes were allowed under that extremely copy-left license.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

When was RHEL non-sub? I'm guessing you're thinking of the code availability change, or maybe centos? Or are you literally thinking of the RH and not RHEL?

Yeah they were major contributors to open source

Still are.

Had we known, we wouldn't have made so many downstream distros from them.

I remember rocky, alma, oracle, and Amazon. 2 of those are now upstream, 2 are still downstream (and only 1 wasn't corpo backed).

Alternatively they might not have made that change if people weren't literally repacking their product and trying to steal their market share by giving it away for free with cheaper enterprise support. Imagine telling that to a room of rich shareholders.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Or it's just a distro that allows you to have a list of packages, configs (when it's not significantly simpler an clearer to just stow), and rollbacks for both. Depends on you.

I believe it's got a death and purgatory feel to it if you don't know some coding, so it should go nicely with the card.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No missing/outdated/renamed dependencies while building it?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Did I ask for a command? Give that a try in Debian 10...

 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/14020506

The product of a chat with @[email protected]

 

The product of a chat with @[email protected]

 

MX Linux, Xfce 4.18

Closing the laptop lid suspends the system, opening it resumes it, but the screen is black. I'm guessing it's related to powerup because suspending through the logout menu and systemctl suspend both work as expected. When it's black, switching to a different tty works, as well as C-M-Backspace to logout.

Same results with both lightdm and sddm, when replacing suspend with hibernate, and I've tried a few solutions like disabling lock on sleep.

Seems like this issue has been around for years, but had a whole bunch of different causes since every other thread has a different solution.

XFSETTINGSD_DEBUG=1 xfsettingsd --replace --no-daemon > /tmp/xf.log 2>&1

ps -ef | grep -E 'screen|lock'

xfconf-query -c xfce4-power-manager -lv

dmesg, cleared it before trying to suspend

updates:

I'm not seeing a black screen, instead it turns on the display and then turns it off.

Additionally, I tried closing and opening the lid a few times, and it woke up correctly.

I tried it in i3wm with the xfce power manager to suspend after closing the lid. It woke up correctly 10 times in a row.

Solution: start an xrandr config and the monitor turns back on.

30
Non-general purpose posts (programming.dev)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

This community is:

A general purpose programming community for English speakers

Language specific posts like:

and ide specific posts like:

are not general purpose. Posts like that ruined /r/programming for me, and this community seems to be going down the same road. I'm here to read about programming concepts that can be applied to any/most languages, not patch notes for 10 different Js frameworks posted by karma farming bots. If I wanted to read posts like that, I'd have subbed to /c/javascript...

Do you agree with me that they should be removed from /c/programming, and limited only to their respective communities? Or have I missed the point of this community?

view more: next ›