SuluBeddu

Absolutely not, I did not imply that, the post is about digital reproduction/ownership of music (if I haven't misunderstood it)

And that is, basically, free, a very "low" cost of copying bytes. What we pay on Spotify and Apple Music are not the artists, not their instruments or recording hardware or mastering software.

We pay the intermediaries.

Concerts, museums, theatres, etc, have high costs so I'm completely fine for them to cost money to the visitors.

(Oh and I believe Bandcamp is a close second)

Ideally one wouldn't need to pay to experience a form of art

Rather, one should first experience the art, and then if they want they could make a donation

I think that buying a CD directly from the musician at their concert or event is the only truly direct way that doesn't end up giving most of the money to monopolistic intermediary

"Don't you have time for our lord and saviour?"

"I still haven't finished reading the Times, I'll drop by them when I'm done"

"Yes, Vance thinks" is the news here

Ma cosa mi dici dici dici mai

faccia sorpresa di topo gigio

La tecnologia non sostituisce, in toto, quasi nessuno.

La domanda non è chiederci se un giorno la figura dello psicologo sarà completamente soppiantata da un sistema automatico "migliore". Semmai ciò che è più probabile che accada è che, in un contesto di libero mercato, delle aziende decidano di offrire servizi psicologici a più basso costo di uno psicologo, eseguendo molti passaggi con una AI, per ridurre i costi.

Poi, a lungo andare, se questa organizzazione del lavoro dovesse funzionare, potrebbe crearsi uno standard, potrebbe essere incrementata la ricerca su questo caso d'uso, e quindi alla lunga una buona dose di psicologi potrebbero vedersi con meno lavoro disponibile, o il loro salario diminuito al punto da scoraggiare altri a intraprendere la carriera.

A mio parere, queste discussioni su cosa la AI non sarà mai in grado di fare lasciano molto il tempo che trovano, non imparano da ciò che è realmente accaduto ai vari mestieri e settori in cui la AI sta prendendo piede.

Exactly, you need a specific setup to enjoy it, and you need to give it focus!

I don't think that making content specifically to be liked by people who wouldn't enjoy the typical style is a good concept... It can be explored sure, but they also need to make sure to make new trak-like content too

But again I really need to see discovery and snw to see how things are going right now. I also don't want to judge the s31 movie before watching it

My personal experience is that one should be ready to watch star trek.

When I was 20 I simply wasn't ready and didn't try watching any of it despite a friend insisting it was worth it.

Two years ago, instead, I was so ready that I could enjoy TOS too

I'm still not at discovery, so I need to see the nuTrek to say more. But I really just think you can't advertise trek too much.