Tartas1995

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can think that way but it isn't what I wanted to say, which is what I said.

No reason to be hostile. You ain't winning when you are.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah the child thing is embarrassingly the kind of thought process that a child would have. An adult can't be flawed, is famously a thing a lot of children think of their parents at first. And it isn't proper, which is why I said the conversation doesn't have to be so black and white. Ironically this paragraph isn't nice either.

I am not sure if "thinking less of them" should be read as "less than me".

Anyway I don't have an issue with you. I just thought the conversation is very hostile when your point seems to be about appreciating others and welcoming difference. It seems to be a waste of your energy and time.

Take care!

Edit: if you are wondering why I focused my critic on you. They didn't seem interested in a conversation anyway. I mean "sky daddy"?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I think this conversation is way more black and white than it needs to be.

You can love and respect someone while thinking that that one belief is really stupid. In fact shockingly stupid. (Not saying religion is shockingly stupid)

I am sure, your best friend once said something or did something that you judged them for negatively. Made you think less of them. While loving them as a whole.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Last time I tried, disconnecting the PC from the internet worked.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

That is the insane part. Honestly I thought so. I literally read an bias as fuck biography of that guy, believing that I would find some competency. Even they failed to spin the yarn in that way. The most positive spin was effectively "musk is a good promiser/beggar".

Context, it was in the early Tesla days, in which people hope he would kickstart a change.

[–] [email protected] 199 points 2 days ago (7 children)

So the "tech genius" doesn't know how to install windows without a Microsoft account and doesn't know how to Google it?

May I introduce the man who wants you to think he is a genius!

Thanks Elon for being so transparently incompetent.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

I think the more punchline phrasing for it:

Fascist = wants to have control over you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

I heard he tried to commission custom hentai but no one wanted to do anything that fucked up, so he started to develop ai, but as he is not getting anywhere, he is back trying to commission stuff.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

I agree with you 100% and I want to highlight how weird that behavior is.

First you need to analyze an ad. Then you need to ignore that she has a brand and marketing 101 is that ad needs to fit the brand. Then you need to feel like you can make place for your partner to shine. Only then you can come to these poorly thought-out conclusions.

What it really is:

She takes photos that fits her branding. It is a play on "behind every great man is a great woman..." Highlighting that the greatness of a woman can be her strength/power and the greatness of a man can be their love and care.

What they read, "man behind woman, man take care of children, weak". How insecure is that?

It is a loving supportive message to men and women and they read it like that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Out of curiosity, besides weed, compared to what else is alcohol worse? And what drugs are worse than alcohol?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

I would really like it as an optional feature

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

That you can have automated tab groups by Container

 

I keep hearing about how you shouldn't laugh over your own jokes but when I watch a video or listen to a podcast, I find it much more authentic and likable when they laugh over their own jokes in a conversation. You know, vibes.

 
view more: next ›