TheLepidopterists

joined 3 years ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I am familiar with one of these but I'm not sure how doxxy it'd be to say which

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

You could go to an instance that blocks us, like Lemmy.world if you are that scared of communists.

Alternatively this third party app Pretty Private Browsing has instance blocking features I think, but I don't care for the UI personally.

Final option I guess is to cry about it?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

"Yes, but if they invite allied troops into their country it stills counts as an invasion of Ukraine. What do you mean that isn't independence? "

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That seems like a real bad idea

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago

Hey this isn't simulated liberalism at all, I've been had!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

New conspiracy theory, Biden is an actual Marxist sleeper agent but Xi was tidying up one day and accidentally threw away the slip of paper with the activation phrase written on it, which is why Biden is indistinguishable from a conservative who hates unions.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Yeah because it betrays your actual beliefs

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You keep saying that you support it and then adding caveats that prove that you actually don't.

"I support Tom's claim that he owns this house and would only want brief jail time for Susan's breaking and entering through the unlocked front door when he invited her over to help protect him from his neighbors Steve, who keeps shooting at him. That said, Susan went way too far when she also did a breaking and entering into Steve's yard to attack him while he continued to shoot at Tom while shouting 'That house is rightful Steve property and Tom the cockroach can scurry back to Susan's house.'"

If someone said this, the only logical conclusion is that they actually fully support Steve and are lying about supporting Tom.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Are you suggesting that the majority of Uyghurs support ETIM. Furthermore, ARE you stating that you personally support the self determination of the ETIM movement?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (8 children)

You're literally mad at me for NOT reading between the lines and assuming you meant something other than what you said, asshole.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (10 children)

If I said that I supported people's rights to sell marijuana and I didn't even think they should get much jail time for it, people would rightly point out that I was lying about my support.

You stated that you supported self determination for people in the Donbas, and I didn't ignore it at all, I'm saying that even within the same post you proved that you actually didn't when you referred to their allies entering their territory as an invasion.

Again, I'm not ignoring anything, I just think you're a liar and that you only started pretending to support the Donbas's self determination because doing otherwise would undermine the point you were trying to make about Taiwan.

view more: next ›