Seems like none of these refer to information lookup services but to generative ai
I use Google search, gemini, and local llms of various models.
THIS is why I'm so fucking pissed at people like you.
You can't even keep your stories straight from one post to another. You hallucinate more than all the LLMs of the world put together.
So, I put up my receipts for the claim that this shit is making you weaker. As far as I'm concerned, especially with your little instant-contradiction thing here, that pretty much establishes that you're full of shit.
...and assuming I am an ai bro...
Oh, my. Someone coming to "Fuck AI" and defending AI for absurd amounts of time, who ignores evidence provided to counter his claims about the benefits of AI ... why would anybody identify this as an aibrodude?
It's a mystery.
But it's not one that's going to be solved with any more of my fucking time.
I did something with Perplexity as a test. I asked it a complicated question (which it botched because despite being "search-driven" it searches like a grandma using Google for the first time, and I mean the current slop-based Google). After giving it more information to finally get the right topic, I started asking questions designed to elicit a conclusion. Which it gave. And it gives you the little box saying what steps it's supposedly following while it works.
Then I asked it to describe the processes it used to reach its conclusion.
Guess which of these occurred:
Edited to add:
I was out of the number of "advanced searches" I'm allowed on the free tier, so I did this manually.
Here is a conversation illustrating what I'm talking about.
Note that I asked it twice directly, and once indirectly, to explain its thinking processes. Also note that:
"Reasoning" AI is absolutely lying and absolutely hallucinating even its own processes. It can't be trusted any more than autocorrect. It cannot understand anything which means it cannot reason.