canihasaccount

Reposts are better than no posts. Plus, plenty of people could have missed the original.

There's some evidence for the same mechanism of action reducing PFAS:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041008X24003879

https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-025-01165-8

My merit review this year specifically noted my high volume of peer review for why I exceeded expectations in the 20% service part of my contract. Again I say, faculty are remunerated for peer review. It's better to do peer review for the service part of my contract than it is to sit on faculty senate. Doing peer review helps my research. It's a win-win, unless I don't want to get my full merit raise because i ignored service.

Case studies are not scientific evidence, they're well-documented anecdotes that suggest the need for scientific study.

Faculty are paid for doing peer review just like we're paid for publishing. We're not paid directly for each of either, but both publishing (research) and peer review (service to the field) are stipulated within our contracts. Arxiv is also free to upload to and isn't a journal with publication fees.

Presumably much of the propaganda is coming from LLM bots trained by Russian state actors to produce propaganda. I don't think the average Russian knows enough English or cares enough to get on Twitter and sew discord.

Feed two birds with one scone

I don't have a good alternate for the guinea pig that has the same meaning

Feed a fed horse

Bring home the daikon

Move the thicket by the thorns

Professors literally get like $0.03 per copy of a book sold. Your professors make you buy their book because no one else teaches the class like they can. It's their expertise that you're paying for when you go to college to study under them. They're making sure that you have something related to that that lasts.

They're trained on scientific writing, and we em dashes all the time in scientific writing.

Wankpuffin is actually a specific example (given within the paper) of British vulgarity considered in this study.

Even somewhere warmer, I'm a 2 year-round, too. I just have one very cool sheet that I use in the summer.

Methods sections are limited in word count, and if a lab is hoping to get a few more papers out of a paradigm, they may be intentionally terse. There's a big difference between how we write protocols in-house and how we write limited-length methods sections.