Calling a bomb threat on the plane just before takeoff. That'll really confuse things but it'll get the job done.
echodot
So you going to head back to a random Wednesday and be like nope not happening yet, let's try tomorrow, nope. Maybe next week?
Let's be honest though if there were sex bots AI would be even more popular than it already is
Did you just use a backtick as an apostrophe? You are an absolute savage.
Oh so you're the AI
I actually like using em dashes because it's the correct thing to do. Also the Oxford comma, correct use of semi colon, and listing things in threes.
What do you bet that if you were Vibe coating in python it would import a library so it could do zero indexing again?
The newspaper he was writing for is a major publication he absolutely could have asked someone.
The problem here is the newspaper didn't care enough about the article to put anyone on it who is even remotely familiar with technology. They probably thought of it as just some throwaway piece to fill out a bit of space. Which to be fair it would have been had it not been for that comment.
I don't think it's the variable for counting the number of us in a group that's the issue here. There'll be some internal tracker that gives everyone in the chat group a local ID probably for the purposes of ensuring that everyone stays in sync.
If you leave the group and then go into a different chat group you'll probably have a different number in that group because the internal counter is specific to the chat, not to the user ID which will be a unique ID used across all interactions for that phone number.
Computers start counting at zero, (unless it's python) so the first person in the group would be ID 0, the second person would be ID 1
Also they can't use computers anyway. They just publicly post on social media. It's considered secure because no one likes them enough to follow them.
How are they going to understand a language that doesn't exist yet?