The UK government is forcing them and all other web services to do the same. UK-hosted Mastodon servers may coast under the radar for awhile, but they'll come for them eventually.
Rather than getting mad at Bluesky for implementing government-mandated age verification, how about actually getting mad at the UK government?
Yeah, I get pushing for Mastodon over Bluesky, but Bluesky is being forced to do this by the UK government for UK citizens so this is just exaggerated rage bait.
Same for me with the same error
Verizon's customer portal. Clunky, badly designed interface and what should be simple tasks end in dead pages, non-responsive widgets, and interminable loading screens. Just awful.
None of the age verification services respect privacy - that's baked into the whole push for it. Because it's not just about "verifying" people's ages at a specific point in time, especially in the US, it's about being able to prove you have in case anyone tries to sue you.
Was thinking it's either going to be food poisoning, completely unpalatable food combinations, or it'll all be a sham and they'll have their usual solution of immigrants doing all the actual work - and who are underpaid indentured servants and have had their passports confiscated.
Food of the gods, and almost as soothing as Xanax if you're having a bad day. Also, honestly not as bad for you as a regular PB&J made with many big name jams/jellies. For extra decadence, toast the fluff.
Headlines like this really need to put the emphasis on the cause, e.g. "UK Government Forces Bluesky to Roll Out Age Verification"
You do know they're rounding up and incarcerating/deporting legal immigrants and talking about denaturalizing citizens, right? They left that argument behind about only going after "illegals" after the inauguration. Now we've got Stephen Miller basically recreating internment camps and Laura Loomer talking about feeding 65 million Hispanics to alligators.
You can tell my brain already left for the long weekend - no idea where that brain fart came from.
From the guy who glossed over real historical/social issues in Titanic? ~~Who ignored many of the moral issues of Bruce Wayne preferring to play dress up instead of working to fix Gotham?~~ [Edit: I'm an idiot] Or who ripped off storylines from better movies, slapped Papyrus font on the title, and made an overly indulgent series of movies that are more pretty screensaver than cinema? He can fuck off.
Why do you think Mastodon is exempt from those rules? The law applies to all sites/services with a significant UK audience - some of the Mastodon .uk instances will definitely be subject to this, and because of how badly the law is written, it can apply to many more.
People can have their hardon for hating Bluesky, but they're literally just trying to avoid being fined by the UK govt here - this wasn't their idea.