Texts are easy to forget and difficult to write? Disagree. Texts are easy to remember and can be viewed back at any time. Writing is a bit slower than speaking, but at least it allows you to think about what you're saying. There's definitely a place where speaking is preferable, but then it should be in person or via a laptop video/voice call so the quality is better and I can do other stuff.
gerryflap
Honestly, probably not longer than a weekend. And even that was due to being at a festival, not because of any outage. I can't remember an outage longer than an hour tbh
Because it forces you to drop everything out of nowhere, losing all the focus you may have had. And then you might need to hold the phone, you need to find a place where you don't annoy everyone around you, and so you basically cannot look up anything.
Text is much superior imo, and messages can be answered whenever convenient (depending on urgency). But even people talking in real life are much better than a call. You can see them coming, you keep your hands free and a can usually stay where you are, they're way better to understand than shitty call quality.
For me it's a few reasons:
- It demands my attention right here, right now
- I don't know that it's going to happen, I cannot prepare
- Usually during the call I'm forced to hold the phone, meaning I can't look stuff up or write stuff down easily
- I fidn listening way harder than reading, and the quality of calls doesn't help with that
I much prefer text because it give some time to delay answering until it's convenient for me, look up answers to any questions I may have, and because I can re-read and think about stuff.
Calling is like an interrupt forcing me to drop everything there and then and immediately provide an answer, messaging is something I poll every now and then when I'm not overloaded or focused so I can actually take the time to answer.
I disagree. Under the right conditions (read: actual competition instead of unregulated monopolies) I think a capitalist system be able to stay ahead, though I think both systems could compete depending on how they're organized.
But what I'm more interested in is you view that China is still Socialist/Communist. Isn't DeepSeek a private company trying to maximize profits for itself by innovating, instead of a public company funded by the people? I don't really know myself, but my perspective was that this was more of a capitalist vs capitalist situation. With one side (the US) kinda suffering from being so unregulated that innovation dies down.
Ja lijkt me ook. Ik ben momenteel zelf vrij flexibel. Als iemand een nog veiligere app zou gebruiken dan zou ik ook die installeren. Zolang het maar geen Facebook messenger oid is, want dat vertrouw ik niet meer.
Although censorship is obviously bad, I'm kinda intrigued by the way it's yapping against itself. Trying to weigh the very important goal of providing useful information against its "programming" telling it not to upset Winnie the Pooh. It's like a person mumbling "oh god oh fuck what do I do" to themselves when faced with a complex situation.
Just like DLSS can generate frames or pixels, it can generate a line that goes up too
Hardstyle, (Electronic) Hardcore, DnB, Trance. Don't really mind metal etc either, but I generally don't listen to it myself. Most pop music bores me because it's too slow. I need speed and intensity but I don't really mind repetition.
The difference is that you can actually download this model and run it on your own hardware (if you have sufficient hardware). In that case it won't be sending any data to China. These models are still useful tools. As long as you're not interested in particular parts of Chinese history of course ;p
I'm so happy this happened. This is really a power move from China. The US was really riding the whole AI bubble. By "just" releasing a powerful open-source AI model they've fucked the not so open US AI companies. I'm not sure if this was planned from China or whether this is was really just a small company doing this because they wanted to, but either way this really damages the western economy. And its given western consumers a free alternative. A few million dollars invested (if we are to believe the cost figures) for a major disruption.
Most people call me to get some information or to push some information to me. Unless they need the answer now I want a text message of some sort, not a call. I'm okay with people like my parents calling at a predetermined moment to catch up. But most people who want to call me want to do so at a moment when a text message would be hugely preferable, so I don't answer unless I get a reason (via text) why the call should happen now. In many cases this leads to the conversation going much more efficiently via text and allows me to actually defer it to when I have time or energy for it.