howrar

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] howrar 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I like the one(s) that bring(s) in posts from Hacker News since they have a high likelihood of being interesting, and I like seeing what the people of Lemmy think of them. Other than that, I don't think I've seen any others that add value to my Lemmy experience.

[–] howrar 1 points 5 days ago

It allows you to compare between different package sizes for the same product, but not between different products. Our goal here is to compare different products.

[–] howrar 2 points 6 days ago

Added Nesquik to the table.

if you make that kind of analysis with anything at Costco you are always going to buy the thing at Costco, which is the fundamental trade off of Costco, giving up variety for good prices on large quantities.

This kind of analysis just tells you what the costs are. If price is all you care about, then sure, you'll just get everything at Costco. But usually, there's much more at play than just price. This would tell you how much you're paying for the other things you might care about, thus enabling you to make a decision on whether or not it's worth it.

[–] howrar 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Would it be? When you buy food, it's usually either for the nutrition content, satiety, or flavour. Absolute mass doesn't correlate with any of these as far as I'm aware. How would you use this value?

[–] howrar 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The person you borrow from gets a small guaranteed win because you get paid a small amount for the privilege of borrowing their shares. The one who loses is whoever bought the shares at the higher price. That can be the person borrowing the shares, or it can be another person interacting with the stock market at the other end of your transaction.

[–] howrar 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (6 children)

I decided to do the math and compare them to my go-to cereal (Post’s Cranberry Almond).

  • Post: I can get a 1.4kg box from Costco for under $10
  • Farm girl: Has 4 types of cereals, all are $11 for a 280g bag, discounted to $8.25 each with subscribe and save.
  • Truely: $60 for 800g. There doesn’t appear to be any cheaper options.

| Brand | Quantity | Calories | Protein | Price (CAD) | Calories/$ | Protein/$ | Calories/protein |


|


|


|


|


|


|


|


| | Post Cranberry Almond Crunch | 1.4kg | 5333 | 89g | $10 | 533 | 9g | 59/g | | Farm Girl (All 4 types) 🍁 | 280g | 1180 | 90g | $8.25 | 143 | 11g | 13/g | | Truely (Except chocolate peanut butter) 🍁 | 800g | 3200 | 360g | $60 | 53 | 6g | 9/g | | Nesquik | 340g | 1252 | 18g | $6.49 | 193 | 2.8g | 70/g |

I'm mostly looking for easy Calories, so at 4x the cost, I can't justify making the switch. For those who are mainly looking for protein and a convenient breakfast to fill your stomach, the Canadian versions look pretty good. Note that this says nothing of how filling they are or how good they taste.

Happy to add some others to the table for ease of comparison. Just give me the nutritional info and how much you pay for them.

[–] howrar 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's a few scenarios where I think it's worthwhile to get into these discussions online. Listed below in order of how much effort I'd put into it.

  • I don't know enough to hold an opinion or my currently opinion stands on shaky grounds, and I either want the other party to convince me of their position, or use the discussion to flesh out my thoughts and come to a more solid conclusion.
  • The stance I currently hold differs from the other party and I want to understand where we diverge. Do they know something I don't? Did they consider a variable that I didn't think about? Did they just start from a different set of "facts" and neither of us have the means of verifying which is correct?
  • I agree with their conclusion but disagree with how they reached it. The intent is to help the other party strengthen their position so that they can go off and preach the good word to everyone else more effectively.

The last scenario is the only one where I'm actually trying to change someone's mind. I do recognize that it's unlikely, which is also why I wouldn't put much effort into this. For everything else, the exercise of putting your thoughts into coherent words and thinking in new directions is where the value lies. Having the discussion with someone else forces you to consider many things that you wouldn't otherwise think about on your own.

Handling hate speech is tangential to promoting logical and well thought out discussions. I believe that this kind of community necessarily has to be homogenous in terms of values, otherwise there's nothing to discuss. If I want to maximize the number of oranges growing in the orchard and you want to maximize the number apples, then that's two conflicting goals. If we get into a discussion on how to manage the orchard, it won't go anywhere because at the end of the day, I don't care for apples and you don't care for oranges. There's no amount of logic that can convince your taste buds to change how they respond.

[–] howrar 4 points 1 week ago

Do they also have a playlist for his cook time? I feel like it might be useful in the upcoming years.

[–] howrar 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So that must be what Spotify's doing with all the data they're collecting.

[–] howrar 2 points 1 week ago

The cook time varies a lot based on how dry the pasta is, which depends on how old they are, how they've been stored, and the air humidity where they're stored. It can vary as much as ±5min. Even on a conventional stovetop, it takes about 30s at most to come back to a boil after you drop in the pasta.

The best way to get perfectly cooked pasta is to regularly check on them.

[–] howrar 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Whatever you decide to do, make sure to keep backups. You don't want to lose years of work because of a hard drive failure.

[–] howrar 13 points 1 week ago

I'm assuming you're talking about the US leadership? Eminem has been putting out music critical of every (2) Republican president since getting big.

 

Following up on another question about open source funding, how does it usually work when there is funding to pay for the dev's work, then someone new joins in and makes significant contributions? Does the original dev still keep everything? Do you split the funds between the devs? If so, how do you decide how much each person gets? Are there examples of projects where something like this has happened?

10
(OTHER) How are we doing? (self.actual_discussion)
submitted 8 months ago by howrar to c/actual_discussion
 

This community has been around for a few months now. How do we feel about it? Are things working out? Any plans for further growing the community?

This is one of the topics I’ve been thinking a lot about quite a bit for the past few years (i.e. how to set up a community that values discussions with diverse viewpoints), so I thought I’d share some of my thoughts in relation to what I’m seeing here.

  1. I think such a community necessarily needs to be a full self-contained instance, or else you’ll get very little activity. Think about how these discussions usually start. Someone posts an article/meme/question/etc, a few people show up and comment with similar thoughts about it worded in slightly different ways, then another shows up and goes against the grain, everyone dogpiles on them, and that’s when the real discussion starts. Very rarely do people go out of their way to ask “what do you think of X controversial topic?” And even if you do, that only leads to a very high level discussion that very quickly gets stale. If you get discussion in the context of specific events, then these discussions can be grounded in reality and lead to more unique context-dependent takes each time it comes up.

  2. Regarding upvotes/downvotes: as stated in the rules, they should be used to measure whether a post/comment is a positive contribution to the discussion rather than the number of people who agree with your viewpoint. I don’t believe there’s a way to actually enforce this with the voting system we currently have, but I also think a relatively simple change can fix it. It will require a bit of coding.

    My proposal is a voting system with two votes: one to say that you agree/disagree, and another to say good/bad contribution. With this system, you can easily see if someone only thinks posts they agree with are good contributions, and you can use that information to calculate a total score that weighs their votes accordingly. It’s also small enough of a change that I think most people won’t have a problem figuring it out.

Thoughts?

Also, thank you Ace for taking the initiative in creating this place. It makes me happy to see that others want to see this change too.

18
submitted 8 months ago by howrar to c/fairvote
 

There's many posts here with the purpose of convincing people to support electoral reform. Not so much that's actually actionable. What do we do if we want to change things? For a start, does anyone have information on who's responsible for the election system at each level of government in each of the major cities?

 

I think it's generally agreed upon that large files that change often do not belong while small files that never change are fine. But there's still a lot of middle ground where the answer is not so clear to me.

So what's your stance on this? Where do you draw the line?

 

I suspect this is a problem with posts that have extremely long bodies like this one: https://slrpnk.net/comment/8035803

I'm trying to scroll down to the top first comment and inevitably overshoot. When I i try to scroll back up, it suddenly jumps back to the middle of the OP's body.

 
 

I was looking up when babies can safely start eating untoasted bread and one of the images led me to this website that sells... stuff? Are they selling me the question? Who knows.

Then if you scroll down to the related products, you can buy a basketball club for $30, down from $15!

I'm guessing this is some phishing website looking to steal credit cards. I also still haven't found an answer to my original question.

 

Is it possible for posts to show the domain (TLD and SLD) of link posts?

Use case: I don't want to watch videos so I want to avoid clicking YouTube links. I would like to know that they are YouTube videos without having my phone spend the next minute trying to open YouTube.

2
Sleepiness (forms.gle)
 

I want to get an idea of how people generally feel over the course of the day. Feel free to submit multiple answers at different times.

 

By metadata, I'm talking about things like text descriptions of a photo/video and where they come from, or an explanation of what a certain binary blob contains, its format, how to use it, etc.

The best solution I have right now is xattrs, but those are dependent on the file system, and there's no guarantee that they will stay when the files get moved, especially if the person moving them is unaware of its existence. The alternative is to keep a plaintext file with this metadata alongside every photo/video/binary/etc, but that would be a huge pain to keep in sync since both files have to be moved together.

So my question to you: do you keep this kind of metadata? If so, how do you manage them?

 

With the rapid advances we're currently seeing in generative AI, we're also seeing a lot of concern for large scale misinformation. Any individual with sufficient technical knowledge can now spam a forum with lots of organic looking voices and generate photos to back them up. Has anyone given some thought on how we can combat this? If so, how do you think the solution should/could look? How do you personally decide whether you're looking at a trustworthy source of information? Do you think your approach works, or are there still problems with it?

view more: ‹ prev next ›