@setsneedtofeed @Kichae so much this. I nutshell, it is important to attract as many people as possible that find Fediverse as idea attractive in first place. There is no point of having millions who do not care about platform.
peteriskrisjanis
@DJDarren @Lobstronomosity tech capabilities has never been an issue - there is HTC 4k set which I would love to buy one day, and 90% of GPUs can't fully utilize it anyway.
@DJDarren @Lobstronomosity Oculus has proven that hardware is one thing, but apps is another. And developing and prototyping VR apps is hard, long and expensive. Market is too small for many devs to get super interested in.
@dirtmayor really depends are you up to make good with locals. Just not everyone has that kind of human skill - and that is fine.
@mint @dirtmayor if you don't want to know or understand locals why you even bother to be digital nomad. You can work remotely from home in USA or UK.
@Hexorg @BrooklynMan why invent anything though? We have universal human rights, we have common sense about tolerance, respect towards other opinions - unless they involve inciting hatred towards someone outside of group. Those are very simple rules, and it is very simple to follow them.
Problem comes when hatred to other group is part of your identity. Sorry, but it is entirely on you. Your choice.
@0x815 comfort of group think. For most people, ease of use is what draws them to social networking. Federation is something they don't grasp that easily, and they don't understand danger of concentrating power on one platform.
I still think it is great Fediverse is here and evolves. It won't attract huge numbers of users, but it might not need to to keep going.
@AnagrammadiCodeina @alyaza what is normal? Bird site lost people even before Musk.