pinkystew

joined 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Wasn't this one of the most heartbreaking scenes in the entire series? Why was this specific scene used as a meme It just feels so irreverent

(Edit for context: there's a meme where you arrange elements in a specific pattern to make it look like a scene from a web comic called "this is loss" it's about a miscarriage)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

I'm not OP but I think it means "Providers are saying consumers should accept subscription-based models without complaint"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

it does have some qualities of Nirvana fallacy in that it implies my support for a policy is inadequate unless I provide a perfect, personal solution. but thanks for your response.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Nope, these sheriffs do not "want it for elections", they want it for themselves. We're on the same side here and I'm sorry to be antagonistic but I don't agree with you excusing their behavior as principled in any way unless you also do it for sovereign citizens, because it is exactly the same thing: "the rules only apply to me when it's convenient."

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (9 children)

why is "interest from women" the last item? anon claims Greek lifestyle but ignores that the ancient Greeks normalized homosexual behavior? .

It's a funny meme but it reeks of ignorance and entitlement.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I'm brand new to Lemmy.

I've seen multiple comments suggesting that .ml be defederated. It was the first thing I saw when I got here. Sounds like there's a bad apple and nothing is being done about it

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

It's called a fucking ferret? That's adorable? I want one? wtf I'm screaming

[–] [email protected] 69 points 5 months ago (9 children)

Nirvana fallacy, also know as "perfect solution fallacy" is suggesting that no solution is better than an imperfect solution. If I can't have nirvana, I don't want anything.

I see it all the time in online arguments. "Oh, you advocate for housing the homeless? Well then why do you have empty rooms in your house? Just fill it with homeless people." this is an example of the fallacy. It suggests that my solution, "house the homeless" should be discarded because it is not a perfect solution, which would be filling my house up with strangers. The goal is to make me say, "oh, I'm not willing to do that, so we should do nothing instead."

[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 months ago (14 children)

I asked a dealer for a dumb-car. No fucking auto 911 dialing, bluetooth enabled, GPS service horseshit, just a normal car and he shot me

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Thanks I'm panicking now! 🫠

view more: ‹ prev next ›