red

In a perfect world the UI would be customizable to the extent that I feel at home and don't need to unlearn and relearn patterns ingrained in my brain. For me those patterns are very relevant as I work in the field and every time the tools force me to spend more time working around them instead of with them, lead to loss of efficiency.

Extension support exists in some Chrome based browsers, too. Kiwi Browser also comes to mind.

Remote debugging is also important to me, and even though you can install Chrome dev tools in Firefox, it doesn't work with remote debugging.

Like i said earliier, im a web dev, and that's a list of web standards, and a comparison which browser has implemented which spec.

You literally said you don't understand them, so maybe brush up on the subject you are discussing instead of telling others how things are?

I'm not defending anything, just providing info and saying why I use what I use.

If a browser is missing official standards features, then the browser is objectively lagging behind. Yes, the web devs are at fault for using things that lack wider support, but that comes down to many factors such as having the time and money to implement things in a more complex manner to support more browsers. That's not always feasible or possible if a certain core feature lets us save hours or days.

I find this weird, as I've seen trans and lqbtq ads in brave befofe disabling ads. I checked Eich out now, is the whole controversy really just due a 1000$ donation to a christian group (which had anti gay agendas among other things)?

I'm honestly just a bit baffled, might be I'm just very out of the loop.

Websites would use more things more liberally if support didn't lag behind. Used to be that Safari was the new IE9 in that aspect, but Firefox has gradually been getting behind past few years.

https://caniuse.com/?compare=chrome+135%2Cedge+131%2Csafari+18.3%2Cfirefox+137&compareCats=all

No extension support sadly, I still have it as my secondary on desktop.

If you are referring to Eagle S, it carried 35 000 tons of unleaded fuel.

We Finns have impounded the contents.

The ship itself will probably not be released back, due it being a tool for crime. Likely it will be sold in order to decrease the repair costs of the cable. Or stripped for parts.

The seamen operating it are being processed by our judical system for crimes: 9 (out of 24) are suspected for sabotage and disrupting communications.

Otherwise I agree with you, but a bug thats been tracked to be caused by a bad rest api call causing the client to crash is not Apples fault in the slightest.

CIvs have had lots of Mac players, enough so that they keep releasing it on the platform.

In this case, the bug ruined cloud games for our friendgroup that rarely has time for an active session. I'm a PC gamer, but two of us are not.

If they release an advertize a feature, it should function for everyone who purchased the game.

Their lack of commubication and ultimately not fixing it (at first, they said within 6 months - now it's been nearly 8 years) is the reason me and our group votes with our wallets for what it's worth.

I'm not buying it. Civ 6 had play by cloud, and this crashes on Mac every time you end your turn.

Despite acknowlidging the bug, years and years later it's still broken.