ryannathans

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 days ago

Firefox does ask the user for this permission

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

What were the interactions with support like each time?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

It's just ideas and reflection, put down your phone and be alone with your thoughts

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

It's more of a diary

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

Even competent programmers cannot look at an app in an afternoon and determine if it's safe, apart from the most glaringly obvious issues

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Are those two smeg knives

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Take that Heisenberg

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 days ago (6 children)

This flatpak debate is a hell of a lot of theatre.

We have a published flatpak app, we could slip anything in, there's no strong audit process. There is an audit process, but it's not comprehensive.

The requirements are trivial to meet, and we did practically nothing to meet them. It's supposed to be easy.

This is one of these scenarios where everyone is technically correct.

Our flatpak downloads and executes binaries, none of this extra security and sandboxing mentioned is relevant or usable.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

In other words complete bullshit until proven otherwise

view more: ‹ prev next ›