sagar

joined 4 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

The whole way of capitalism is, there's problem xyz. If you want it solved for you, pay me Rs.1000. If someone solves it for free, he stays broke. The posers of problem win, the solvers of problem lose. That's capitalism. Sometimes, the solvers of the problem are themselves the posers of the problem.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 years ago (4 children)

I'm based at India. There is so much competition here that I find, in the system itself, there is extreme deception. eg. To repair laptop hinges, one just has to make sure that metal and plastic is stuck together and things aren't broken. That's an easy task which can be done in half an hour. Yet, even if the repairing person is free, he'll tell you that it would take 5 hours so you keep the laptop and go away. Then he'd do the work and pose as if it's super difficult. He just has to apply some adhesive.

Everyone presents here as if solutions cannot be implemented without them and they charge higher than normal amounts as if there's no tomorrow. Issue is that these people itself in the system are trying to make repairing tougher for you. Ofc, it's just flawed capitalism at work!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 years ago

Absolutely. The whole point of ads is to earn money and survive. That's definitely an option!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 years ago (2 children)

The biggest issue here is the problem of compatibility of free software with capitalism. If money comes in, people who want to earn will arrive. I highly suggest that random non-targeted ads must be incorporated within federated softwares. That would make the projects earn without compromising with user's privacy. Today, all projects survive on donating party's courtesy!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago (2 children)

My solution to this issue is like this:

  1. Have an institution like FSF which sells binary with open source code (copyright still belongs to dev) till adequate cost is recovered. (Say first 1000 copies of software binary for $50). After selling 1000 copies, source code's license would be changed to free say AGPLv3 and gradually, software price would come down till zero.
  2. Curtail the freedom of distributing copies. This would enable you to fiddle as much as you want on your computer but not distribute free copies.

These solutions enable free software devs to survive in capitalistic world! They're compatible with capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (3 children)

I agree with you fully @[email protected] . Free Software is essentially incompatible with capitalism. I work as a dev at Hyperbola OS and I've raised this issue several times.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 years ago

Check out suckless.org , hyperbola.info

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago

https://designman.org/sagaracharya/blog/trusting_no_one

More insightful analysis, BTW, I am a Dev at Hyperbola OS. You should know that I work for free software reaching everyone.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 years ago

Dictator's Handbook, 48 laws of power by Daniel Greene and Diplomacy by Henry Kissinger.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 years ago (1 children)

https://designman.org/sagaracharya/blog/foss_stack

My article on something similar and overlapping.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 years ago

1 month since I left insta. PixelFed is great folks. Welcome there!

view more: ‹ prev next ›