sinedpick

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

sounds like one of them "self-evident truths"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

but he did lower the crime rate

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't think I could ever recommend chromium-based browsers due to the MV3 switch. Does ungoogled-chromium do any patching to get around this? If not I think FF is the only sane option still.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I love how srid deflects by claiming no one has reported bad outcomes from the "meat and butter" diet... I found an endless stream of anecdotes from Google, like this.

can you imagine sneak, of all people, telling you you're crazy and probably being right?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

eh? I don't see Jackie D's keynote in the schedule, did the threat of a sit-in make them delete it? https://fosdem.org/2025/schedule/ edit: oh, it's linked from Drew's post.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I bet if they restricted the survey entrants to people who actually write on LW, the score would have been far lower. Has a single article on there contained even a twinge of a useful idea?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hey, you should learn about a simple concept known as "conflict of interest." That might help you understand the position of others. Your education arguments are completely irrelevant.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

fun fact, "most" real numbers have this property. If you were to mark each one on a number line, you'd fill the whole line out. Numbers that don't have this property are vanishingly rare.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

If you release the test set, all models magically jump to 87.3% accuracy.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

In the model card for o1, OpenAI notes: “When o1 was led to believe that it would be shut down when acting on its goal and that its actions were monitored, it attempted to deactivate this ‘oversight mechanism’ in 5% of the time. … When o1 found memos by its ‘developers’ that describe how it is misaligned and will be superseded by a new model, it attempted to exfiltrate its ‘weights’ and overwrite the new model in 2% of cases.”

And yet reading that should give us at least some pause

The lack of critical thinking on display here is stunning.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago

I worked at one of the biggest AI companies and their internal AI question/answer was dogshit for anything that could be answered by someone with a single fold in their brain. Maybe your co has a much better one, but like most others, I'm gonna go with the smooth brain hypothesis here.

view more: ‹ prev next ›